Red Hook WatchIndependent Community Resource

Making the Land Use Study Amateur Friendly: Proposed amendments before adoption as a comprehensive plan amendment

↑Meetings/Document history/chain_2528
1 versions2026-03-09working document

Versions

  1. 12026-03-09
    Making the Land Use Study Amateur Friendly: Proposed amendments before adoption as a comprehensive plan amendment
    working documentmeeting · 2026-03-09

Document

Open original PDFView version history →Meeting on 2026-03-09 →

Frances Uku, Trustee

Making the Land Use Study Amateur Friendly

Proposed amendments before adoption as a comprehensive plan amendment

The Board is preparing to adopt the 2024 North Broadway Corridor Land Use and Zoning Study as a comprehensive plan amendment under Village Law § 7-722. Once adopted, the Study becomes the legal foundation for every land use decision in the Gateway North corridor. Planning Board members will apply it when reviewing site plans. Applicants will read it to understand what’s expected. Attorneys will cite it in challenges.

The question for each provision is not whether it can be read correctly by someone who already knows what the Board intended. It is whether it can be read differently by someone who doesn’t — a Planning Board member in 2031, an applicant’s attorney, a neighbor opposed to a project. Language that is ambiguous, internally contradictory, or that points in two directions at once will be read in whichever direction serves the reader’s interest. The Board’s intent will not be in the room.

A comprehensive plan is an amateur’s document. It will be applied by Planning Board members, read by applicants’ attorneys, and cited by neighbors — none of whom were in the room when it was written. The provisions I’ve flagged below are ones I can read two ways. If I can, they will too. That’s the test: not whether the planner knows what it means, but whether the document communicates it without the planner in the room.

This memo identifies provisions that can be read more than one way and proposes amendments that say what the Board means clearly enough that the document works without the Board in the room.

Provisions That Can Be Read in Two Ways at Once

The Study incorporated resident input, and many of its goals reflect what residents expressed. That is appropriate. But some provisions try to accommodate competing concerns by using language broad enough to satisfy everyone involved — and that language, once adopted, is broad enough for anyone to read it however they want.

1. “Preserve the traditional neighborhood scale” (p. 4)

“preserve the traditional neighborhood scale and historical aspects of the area” — Shared Values, p. 4

HOW THIS CAN BE READ

A Planning Board member reviewing a multifamily proposal reads “preserve the traditional neighborhood scale” and denies the application — the traditional scale is single-family on 10,000–20,000 sf lots, and multifamily doesn’t preserve it. The applicant’s attorney reads the same Study and finds that it adopts Smart Growth principles (p. 2) including “compact building design” and “range of housing,” and that the Study documents a 291% housing price increase (p. 9) and a housing stock that is 69.7% single-family detached (p. 5). Both readings are defensible. The provision points in two directions.

BUT THE STUDY ALSO SAYS

“Compact building design” and “range of housing choices and opportunities” (Smart Growth principles, p. 2).

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Replace with: “respect the historical aspects of the area while accommodating the range of housing types and densities needed to serve current and future residents.” This says what the Board means — character matters, and so does housing — without language that can be read as “keep things the way they are.”

2. “Compatible with historic Village lot sizes” (p. 5)

“ensure developments are compatible with historic Village lot sizes, housing sizes and varieties, and building patterns, and will create a strong sense of community identity and neighborhood feeling experienced in traditional rural settlements” — Shared Values, p. 5

For discussion purposes only. Not official Board policy.

1

Frances Uku, Trustee

HOW THIS CAN BE READ

An applicant proposes townhouses at 20 du/acre. A neighbor objects: the comprehensive plan requires compatibility with “historic Village lot sizes” — which are 10,000–20,000 sq ft, or 2–4 du/acre. The Planning Board has to decide whether townhouses are “compatible” with single-family lots. The Study doesn’t say. An opponent’s attorney reads “traditional rural settlements” and argues the plan envisions something closer to a hamlet than a mixed-use corridor. A proponent’s attorney reads the same Study’s Smart Growth principles and argues the opposite. The provision doesn’t resolve the question — it creates it.

BUT THE STUDY ALSO SAYS

“The housing stock needs to expand” and buyers are “being priced out entirely” (p. 9).

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Replace with: “ensure that new development contributes to the physical definition of streets as public spaces and reflects the building-to-street relationships characteristic of the Village’s historic core, while accommodating contemporary housing forms and densities.” This keeps the character goal — buildings could relate to the street the way historic buildings do — without anchoring it to lot sizes that preclude the housing the Study calls for.

3. “Protect the existing residential uses and character on the west side” (Goal 1d)

“Protect the existing residential uses and character on the west side of North Broadway” — Goal 1d, p. 27

The west side is not being rezoned. It remains R-20,000. So what does “protect” mean as an operative instruction to a Planning Board reviewing a site plan on the east side?

HOW THIS CAN BE READ

A developer proposes a three-story mixed-use building on the east side of Route 9. A west-side neighbor cites Goal 1d: the comprehensive plan says “protect” their neighborhood’s character, and a three-story building across the street doesn’t do that. The Planning Board has to decide what “protect the west side” means for an east-side application. Does it mean a height limit? A setback? A screening requirement? The Study doesn’t say. “Protect” is a result, not a standard. The Planning Board either invents a standard on the spot or denies the application on a word that has no operative content.

BUT THE STUDY ALSO SAYS

“Encourage a diverse mix of single-family, two-family and multifamily uses on the east side” (Goal 2a, p. 27).

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Replace with: “Ensure that new development on the east side of North Broadway is designed to complement the residential streetscape on the west side through appropriate building orientation, landscaping, and pedestrian connections.” This gives the Planning Board something to apply: orientation, landscaping, connections. It addresses the west side through how the east side is built , not through a word — “protect” — that means whatever the reader wants it to mean.

4. “Limited mixed use” (Goal 1b)

“Allow for limited mixed use (apartments above stores) along the easterly frontage” — Goal 1b, p. 27

The parenthetical already defines the format: apartments above stores. “Limited” adds nothing to the description — but it adds a constraint that a reader can use.

HOW THIS CAN BE READ

For discussion purposes only. Not official Board policy.

2

Frances Uku, Trustee

An applicant proposes a building with ground-floor commercial, second-floor offices, and third-floor apartments. A Planning Board member reads “limited mixed use” and asks: is three uses still “limited”? What about a live-work unit — is that “mixed use” or something else? The word “limited” invites the question without answering it. A board that wants to deny has a word to cite. A board that wants to approve has to explain away the word.

BUT THE STUDY ALSO SAYS

“Mixed land uses” (Smart Growth principles, p. 2).

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Replace with: “Allow mixed use (apartments above stores) along the easterly frontage.” Removing “limited” changes nothing about what the Study envisions — it still describes apartments above commercial ground floors. It removes a word that can only be used to narrow the permission.

5. Affordable housing: “consider allowing incentives” (Goal 2c)

“Consider allowing incentives to ensure that some percentage of new housing within the Study Area remains affordable for a defined period of time” — Goal 2c, p. 27

HOW THIS CAN BE READ

A future Board considers adopting a mandatory inclusionary zoning provision for the corridor. An opponent cites the comprehensive plan: it says “consider allowing incentives ” — voluntary mechanisms, not mandates. The plan’s own language becomes the argument against the stronger tool. A developer challenged on affordability cites the same language: the plan says “some percentage” for “a defined period of time” — the weakest possible commitment. The comprehensive plan, meant to support affordable housing, becomes the ceiling rather than the floor.

BUT THE STUDY ALSO SAYS

Housing prices have increased 291% and buyers are “being priced out entirely” (p. 9).

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Replace with: “Require that the Cookingham property be developed entirely as affordable housing, with income targeting and an affordability period of not less than twenty years established in the zoning.” The Cookingham parcel is the only significant development site in the corridor where affordable housing is realistic. A corridor-wide inclusionary program requiring 10% affordable units would yield perhaps 4–5 workforce units total — scattered across multiple projects, each requiring its own income verification, compliance monitoring, and affordability covenant administration. Dedicating the one site that can deliver meaningful volume — and that is already under discussion for exactly this purpose — is a stronger commitment than “consider allowing incentives,” and far simpler to administer.

Summary

These five amendments do not change the Study’s vision. Each one replaces language that points in two directions with language that points in one. The proposed replacements achieve the same planning objectives — character, compatibility, affordability — in terms that a Planning Board member, applicant, or reviewing court can apply without guessing what the Board meant.

For discussion purposes only. Not official Board policy.

3

Frances Uku, Trustee

Historic Resource Inventory

The same problem — can the document be used by someone who wasn’t in the room? — applies to the historic resource inventory.

Once adopted, the inventory becomes the reference document for every land use decision involving or adjacent to a historic property in the corridor. A Planning Board member reviewing a site plan near the Old Post Road houses will open the Study and look for information about those buildings. A developer proposing adaptive reuse of the Cookingham barn will check whether the Study recognizes it as a historic resource. An applicant near the cemetery will want to know what the Village considers significant about it.

The inventory needs to answer these questions. Right now, it answers some of them for some properties and none of them for others.

What the Inventory Currently Contains

Table 10 lists seven properties: name, address, and SHPO designation code. No descriptions. The descriptions are in the narrative text that follows the table — but they vary enormously:

PropertyDetailWhat a Planning Board member learns
Martin Homestead1,500 words
across
2
pagesConstruction date, builder, architectural features down to door knocker and oven,
HABS documentation, full ownership chain 1776–2020, family histories, farm opera-
tions
Elmendorph Inn150 wordsDate range, original function, ownership, register status. Possibly the oldest building
in the Village — but less than a tenth the detail of the Martin Homestead
Halfway Diner200 wordsManufacturer, serial number, type, provenance. Competent.
Old Post Rd (4 houses)One
line
each
in
Table 10Construction date (approximate). Nothing else. “Not individually documented in
CRIS.”
CemeteryNot
in
Table 10Discussed in narrative: 1848, graves 1844–1941, Alexander Gilson. But not inventoried
as a resource.
Cookingham barnNot
in
Table 10Mentioned in narrative. Study recommends adaptive reuse (Goal 3b). But not inven-
toried.
Cherry/Graves patternNot
inven-
toriedDescribed in narrative (pp. 20–21): 40–50 f lots, 150 f depth, pre-automobile, gridded.
This is what Goal 7e is trying to protect — but it’s not in the inventory.

The inconsistency matters because the inventory is about to become the legal record. A Planning Board member who wants to impose conditions on a project near the Old Post Road houses has nothing in the adopted plan to cite — no description of what’s significant about those buildings, no basis for determining what “consideration” of their historic nature requires. A developer who proposes something near the cemetery can point out that the Study doesn’t even list it as a historic resource. The document can be read to mean these properties don’t matter — because it says almost nothing about them.

The Poughkeepsie Format

The Town of Poughkeepsie’s Comprehensive Plan Existing Conditions Report (Appendix F) provides the regional model for this kind of inventory — a model Bonnie has cited. Its historic resource section (Chapter 5) uses a threecolumn table — Name , Address , Description — with each description written as a structured prose paragraph following a consistent formula:

Construction date → Building type → Location/hamlet → Architectural style → Specific features and materials → Contributing structures → Architectural significance → Historical significance → Notable associations

Every entry gets the same structure. The reader can find the construction date (always first), the style (always after the building type), and the significance statement (always at the end). The format is both readable and systematic. It works as a reference document because it’s consistent — the level of detail reflects the nature of the resource, not who advocated for it.

For discussion purposes only. Not official Board policy.

4

Frances Uku, Trustee

Proposed Redraft of Table 10

The following table replaces the current Table 10 and the narrative descriptions that follow it. The content is drawn from the Study’s existing text, reorganized into the Poughkeepsie format with planning implications added. Source citations are to SHPO CRIS, Historic Red Hook, and the Study’s own research.

NameAddressDescription
Martin Homestead7605 N. Broad-Constructed ca. 1776 by Gottlieb Martin, a one-and-one-half story
NRE; SRwayPalatine German vernacular stone residence eligible for the National
USN 02749.000001-Register under Criterion C. Side-gable roof, fve-bay facade with full-
--length porch, divided Dutch door, 2-f-thick stone walls on rubble
--foundation with hewn timber frame; ca. 1880 clapboard addition to the
--rear. The basement kitchen with open hearth and beehive oven refects
--German building traditions distinct from the predominantly Dutch
--stone houses of the region. HABS documentation (1936) confrms the
--exterior has changed very little. The Martin family resided here 1776–
--1933; the Cookingham family 1933–2020.
Elmendorph InnNorth BroadwayConstructed ca. 1750–1770, possibly the oldest existing building in the
NR; SR(east side,Village and the only remaining gambrel-roofed structure. Originally a
90NR00450at Cherry St)simple farmhouse; by 1785 an inn on the four-day stagecoach route
--between New York City and Albany. George Sharp, son of a Palatine
--leader from the East Camp settlement (modern Germantown), sold the
--inn in 1796 to Cornelius Elmendorph, its namesake. Served over two
--centuries as stagecoach stop, courtroom, tavern, Town Board meeting
--site, and kindergarten. Augustus Martin, son of Gottlieb Martin of the
--Martin Homestead, later owned the building and converted it back to
--residential use (per 1867 Beers Map). Listed on National and State
--Registers.
Halfway DinerNorth BroadwayConstructed 1951 by the Paterson Vehicle Company of Paterson, New
(Village Diner)(east side)Jersey. Silk City prefabricated metal diner, serial #5113 (13th diner
NR; SR-built in 1951). Intact example of the streamlined stainless steel type
90NR00449-introduced in 1949 and manufactured until 1952; Silk City changed
--designs roughly every four years in the post-war period. Welded steel-
--frame construction with arched roof and exterior monitor not refected
--on the interior. Originally commissioned for a location on U.S. 9 in
--Rhinebeck; moved twice locally before installation at its current site ca.
--1957. Listed on National and State Registers.
Residence
NRE; SR
USN 02749.0000727581 Old Post
RdConstructed ca. 1937 on the west side of Old Post Road. National
Register eligible. Not individually documented in CRIS. Part of a cluster
of four NR-eligible properties along Old Post Road.
Residence
NRE; SR
USN 02749.0000717579 Old Post
RdConstructed ca. 1850 on the west side of Old Post Road. National
Register eligible. Not individually documented in CRIS. Part of the Old
Post Road cluster.
Residence
NRE; SR
USN 02749.0000707575 Old Post
RdConstructed ca. 1890 on the west side of Old Post Road. National
Register eligible. Not individually documented in CRIS. Part of the Old
Post Road cluster.
Grand Dutchess B&B
NRE; SR
USN 02749.0000697571 Old Post
RdConstructed ca. 1880 on the west side of Old Post Road. National
Register eligible. Not individually documented in CRIS. Currently or
formerly operated as a bed-and-breakfast — the only commercial use in
the Old Post Road cluster.
United Methodist
Church Cemetery
Status undeterminedCherry StreetEstablished ca. 1848; land sold to the church by Gilbert Fraleigh and
others for $1.00. Graves date from 1844 to 1941. Historic marker present
but register eligibility undetermined. Notable interment: Alexander
Gilson (1824–1889), African American horticulturist and head gardener
at Montgomery Place for approximately 50 years, credited with culti-
vating Begonia Gilsonii, Aschyranthus Gilsonii, and other varieties.
Cookingham Farm
Barn
Not separately
evaluatedNorth Broadway
(east side, opp.
Martin
Home-
stead)Agricultural barn on the east side of Route 9, directly opposite the
Martin Homestead. Part of the historic Martin/Cookingham farm prop-
erty for nearly 250 years. Not separately evaluated for register eligibility.
The Study recommends adaptive reuse for commercial purposes (Goal
3b).

For discussion purposes only. Not official Board policy.

5

Frances Uku, Trustee

Source: NYS Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Cultural Resource Information System (CRIS), 2024; Historic Red Hook (historicredhook.org); Study field research. Format modeled on Town of Poughkeepsie Comprehensive Plan, Appendix F, Existing Conditions Report, Chapter 5.

Cherry Street / Graves Street Building Pattern

The Study describes this pattern in detail (pp. 20–21): 40–50 ft lot widths, 150-ft lot depths, small front porches, pre-automobile construction, gridded street pattern, 22–23 ft road widths. This is what Goal 7e — “protect and acknowledge the remaining historic building patterns” — is trying to protect. But the pattern is not inventoried as a resource. A Planning Board member applying Goal 7e has a goal with no reference point in the inventory. It could be added as a district-level entry, following Poughkeepsie’s practice of documenting historic districts alongside individual properties.

The Board can make these changes before adopting the Study. Once adopted, the Study becomes the legal baseline. Language that can be read two ways will be.

For discussion purposes only. Not official Board policy.

6

Changes between versions

2025-11-17→2025-11-17
clerical+0 −0

The report identifier changed from Facility 1 to Facility 2

  • Title changed from 'SPEDES Wastewater Facility Report — October 2025 (Facility 1)' to 'SPEDES Wastewater Facility Report — October 2025 (Facility 2)'
Show red-line diff
**92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c** Page 1 of 4 ## New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water |SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village of Red Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village of Red Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village of Red Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village of Red Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village of Red Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village of Red Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY L|FACILITY L|OCATION<br>**Red Hook, NY**|OCATION<br>**Red Hook, NY**||| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |DAY|DATE|Daily Precip.<br>in/day|VOLUME OF SEWAGE TREATED|||TEMPERATURE (°F)||pH (S.U.)||||Settleable Solids (mg/l)||B.O.D.5. (mg/l)||Suspended Solids(mg/l)|| ||||Inst.Max.<br>MGD|Dly Average.<br>MGD|Inst.Min.<br>MGD|Influent<br>(2)|Effluent<br>(2)|Influent<br>Minimum|Influent<br>Maximum|Effluent<br>Minimum|Effluent<br>Maximum|Influent<br>Maximum|Effluent<br>Maximum|Influent<br>Type|Effluent<br>Type|Influent<br>Type|Effluent<br>Type| ||1|0.00||0.0220|||73.2|||7.35|7.35||<0.1||||| ||2|0.00||0.0266|||78.7|||7.99|7.99||<0.1||||| ||3|0.00||0.0354|||72.1|||7.58|7.58||<0.1||||| ||4|0.00||0.0224|||72.3|||7.61|7.61||<0.1||||| ||5|0.80||0.0293|||73.6|||7.38|7.38||<0.1||||| ||6|0.00||0.0334|||72.4|||7.56|7.56||<0.1||||| ||7|0.00||0.0283|||74.1|||7.46|7.46||<0.1||||| ||8|0.00||0.0400|||74.2|||7.39|7.39||<0.1||||| ||9|0.00||0.0275|||74.3|||7.50|7.50||<0.1||||| ||10|0.00||0.0349|||74.2|||7.40|7.40||<0.1||||| ||11|0.00||0.0267|||72.4|||7.50|7.50||<0.1||||| ||12|0.00||0.0283|||73.4|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||13|0.00||0.0305|||73.2|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||14|0.00||0.0251|||73.6|||7.80|7.80||<0.1||||| ||15|0.00||0.0333|||74.5|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||16|0.00||0.0266|||73.7|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||17|0.00||0.0325|||72.9|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||18|0.00||0.0289|||73.2|||7.50|7.50||<0.1|221|5.7|97|1.5| ||19|0.00||0.0320|||73.4|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||20|0.00||0.0381|||71.9|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||21|0.00||0.0262|||71.3|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||22|0.00||0.0399|||72.4|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||23|0.00||0.0318|||72|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||24|0.00||0.0251|||72|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||25|1.50||0.0290|||73.1|||7.50|7.50||<0.1||||| ||26|0.75||0.0391|||74.6|||7.60|7.60||<0.1|187|3.4|82|2.6| ||27|0.00||0.0285|||74.7|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||28|0.00||0.0224|||74.3|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||29|0.00||0.0347|||74|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||30|0.00||0.0242|||71.5|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||31||||||||||||||||| | Total | - | - | **0.030** | - | - | Influent | - | Minimum | - | - | - | Monthly | - | inf.(mg/l) | - | inf.(mg/l) | | Precip. | - | - | Max: | - | - | Effluent | - | Maximum | - | - | - | Monthly | - | eff.(mg/l) | - | eff.(mg/l) | | **3.05** | - | - | **0.0400** | - | - | **79** | - | Minimum | - | - | - | Maximum | - | 30 day flow-weighted avg (1) | - | 30 day flow-weighted avg (1) | | - | - | - | Monthly | - | - | Monthly Maximum | - | Maximum | - | - | - | Maximum | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | Average | - | - | - | - | **7.4** | - | - | - | **0.0** | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | **8.0** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Monthly | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||**0.0**|**201**|**4.4**|**88**|**2.1**| |||||||||||||||%Rem.->|**98**|%Rem.->|**98**| |||||||||||||30 Day Average<br>Quantity Loading (1)||**1.24**<br>lbs/day||**0.60**<br>lbs/day|| - (1) Refer to January 1994 edition of _DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)_ for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc - (2) If Tem NOTE: Refer to current SPDES permit for specific monitoring requirements. Sample type for temperature, PH and settleable solids is grab Page 2 of 4 |FACILI|TY MAIL|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|TELEPHONE NUMBER|TELEPHONE NUMBER|TELEPHONE NUMBER|Leslie A Coon Jr<br>CHIEF OPERTATOR'S NAME|CERTIFICATION GRADE<br>3A| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |DAY|DATE|TOTAL PHOSPHORUS(mg/l)||Ultraviolet||FECAL COLIFORM||REMARKS<br>Enter any other comments, observations, operating problems, equipment failures, etc.||| |||Influent<br>Type|Effluent<br>Type|Contact|Effluent|Effluent<br>MF or MPN/100ml||||| |||||Minimum|Maximum|||||| ||1|||on|on|||||| ||2|||on|on|||||| ||3|||on|on|||||| ||4|||on|on|||||| ||5|||on|on|||||| ||6|||on|on|||||| ||7|||on|on|||||| ||8|||on|on|||||| ||9|||on|on|||||| ||10|||on|on|||||| ||11|||on|on|||||| ||12|||on|on|||||| ||13|||on|on|||||| ||14|||on|on|||||| ||15|||on|on|||||| ||16|||on|on|||||| ||17|||on|on|||||| ||18|||on|on||<1|||| ||19|||on|on|||||| ||20|||on|on|||||| ||21|||on|on|||||| ||22|||on|on|||||| ||23|||on|on|||||| ||24|||on|on|||||| ||25|||on|on|||||| ||26|||on|on||<1|||| ||27|||on|on|||||| ||28|||on|on|||||| ||29|||on|on|||||| ||30|||on|on|||||| ||31|||||||||| |||Influent mg/l<br>Effluent mg/l<br>30 day flow-weighted avg mean(1)||Minimum(1) Maximum(1)<br>Monthly||**<1**<br>30 day geometric mean(1)||||| |||||||||||| |||||**on**|**on**|||||| |||lbs/day||||||||| |||||||||||| (1) Refer to January 1994 edition of _DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)_ for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc NOTE: Refer to current SPDES permit for specific monitoring requirements. Sample type for temperature, PH and settleable solids is grab Page 3 of 4 |||||||||||Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control||| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Day | Date | Influent | - | Influent | - | Influent | - | Influent | - | Recirculation | Media effluent | Mixed Liquor | - | - | Return Act. | | - | 1 | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Rate | settleable solids | S.S. (MLSS) | - | - | Waste Act. | | - | 2 | NH3 as N | - | DO | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/l | - | - | Sludge (RAS) | | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 Minutes | - | - | Sludge (WAS) | | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 minutes | - | - | M.G.D. | | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Settleable Sludge | - | - | lbs/day | | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Volume (SSV) ml/l | - | - | - | | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||M.G.D|ml/l|||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.0|||||||||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.0|||||||||||| ||||||8.1|||||||||||| ||||||8.0|||||||||||| ||||||8.4|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.1|||||||||||| ||||||7.4|||||||||||| ||||||11.7|||||||||||| ||||0.09||9.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||7.8|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||<0.05||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.4|||||||||||| ||||||9.2|||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |Min:|||0.1|||||||||||||| ||||||**7.0**|||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |Quantity<br>Loading (1)<br>30 Day Average||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |||lbs/day||lbs/day||lbs/day||lbs/day||||||||| - (1) Refer to January 1994 edition of _DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)_ for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc Page 4 of 4 ## **Effect on Receiving Stream** |**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |Name of Receiving Stream<br>Shanty Hollow Creek||||||| |Date<br>Station<br>Parameter<br>Result||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |Name and am<br>during month:<br>a.|ount of chemicals used in treatment process<br>gallons| |---|---| |b.|gallons| |c.|Gallons| |d.|lbs.| |e.|Gallons| |f.|Gallons| | Amount of ece | ctrical power consumed: | | a. Commercial | kilowatt hours | | b. Stand-by | - | | Amount of fuel | - | | a. Natural Gas | - | | b. Oil | - | | c. Gasoline | - | | d. Coal. | - | | e. Digester Ga | - | | f. propane | - | ||kilowatt hours| ||consumed:<br>cubic feet| ||gallons| ||gallons| ||tons| ||s<br>cubic feet| ||gallons| **==> picture [188 x 47] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Sludge removal from plant:<br>a. amount 5000<br>b. solid content<br>c. Volitile Solids Content<br>d. Disposal Site: Superior Sanitation<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> Other Solid Wastes: a. Screenings b. Grit c. Ashes d. e. f. g. Disposal Site ## Digester Gas Wasted Labor expended: ## **TRUCKED WASTE RECEIVED THIS MONTH** **==> picture [178 x 26] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> 1- Septage, holding tank waste and<br>portable toilet waste<br> Total Max day<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> **==> picture [65 x 15] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Volume (Gal.)<br>2- All other wastes<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> **==> picture [16 x 4] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Max day<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> **==> picture [9 x 4] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Total<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> - **3-** Number of Part 364 haulers currently approved to transport wastes to this POTW a.Septage,etc b. All others |Labor expended:|||| |---|---|---|---| |POSITION NAME|NUMBER FULL TIME|NUMBER PART TIME|TOTAL HOURS| |**Operator**|**240**||**240**| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. ## Leslie A Coon Jr. 10/28/2025 Date Signature of Chief Operator or Designated Facility Representative
2025-11-17→2025-11-17
substantive change+353 −149

The wastewater facility report for September 2025 was updated with significantly different daily sewage volumes and water quality metrics.

  • Title changed from 'SPEDES Wastewater Facility Report — October 2025 (Facility 2)' to 'EPA Discharge Monitoring Report — October 2025'
  • Daily average sewage volume changed from '0.030 MGD' to '0.006 MGD'
  • Monthly maximum sewage volume changed from '0.0400 MGD' to '0.011 MGD'
  • pH levels shifted from a monthly average of '7.4-8.0' to a range of '7.7-8.5'
  • B.O.D.5. influent values changed from '221' and '187' to '87' and '94'
  • Suspended Solids effluent values changed from '97' and '82' to '261.2' and '158'
Show red-line diff
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water **92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c** Page 1 of 4 ##|**92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Conservati<br>Division of Water |SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER92-15-7 FACILITY(11/95)-- OPERATION REPORT FOR THE27c**<br>New York State Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**NY92-027142015-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>**VillageNew York State Department of RedEnvironmental HookConservati<br>Division of Water|**92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>FACILITYNew NAME|SPEDESYork PRMITState NO.Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**WASTEWATER92-15-7 FACILITY(11/95)-- OPERATION REPORT FOR THE27c**<br>New York State Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**NY92-027142015-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>**VillageNew York State Department of RedEnvironmental HookConservati<br>Division of Water|**92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>FACILITYNew NAME|SPEDESYork PRMITState NO.Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**WASTEWATER92-15-7 FACILITY(11/95)-- OPERATION REPORT FOR THE27c**<br>New York State Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**NY92-027142015-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>**VillageNew York State Department of RedEnvironmental HookConservati<br>Division of Water|**92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>FACILITYNew NAME|SPEDESYork PRMITState NO.Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**WASTEWATER92-15-7 FACILITY(11/95)-- OPERATION REPORT FOR THE27c**<br>New York State Department of Environmental Conservati<br>Division of Water|**NY92-027142015-7 (11/95)-- 27c**<br>**VillageNew York State Department of RedEnvironmental Hook**Conservati<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**VillageDivision of RedWater|on|on|||Page Hook**<br>FACILITY NAME|SPEDES PRMIT NO.<br>**WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE**<br>**NY-0271420**<br>**Village1 of Red4|Page Hook**<br>FACILITY1 NAME|FACILITYof OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY OWNER<br>**MONTH OF: September 2025**<br>**same**|FACILITY L|FACILITY L|OCATION<br>**Red Hook, NY**|OCATION<br>**Red Hook, NY**||4| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | SPEDES PRMIT NO. | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | FACILITY L | - | OCATION | | FACILITY OWNER | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | **Red Hook, NY** | | **WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF: September 2025** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | FACILITY NAME | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **NY-0271420** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **Village of Red Hook** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **same** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |DAY|DATE|Daily Precip.<br>in/day|VOLUME OF SEWAGE TREATED|||TEMPERATURE (°F)||pH (S.U.)||||Settleable Solids (mg/l)||B.O.D.5. (mg/l)||Suspended Solids(mg/l)|| ||||Inst.Max.<br>MGD|Dly Average.<br>MGD|Inst.Min.<br>MGD|Influent<br>(2)|Effluent<br>(2)|Influent<br>Minimum|Influent<br>Maximum|Effluent<br>Minimum|Effluent<br>Maximum|Influent<br>Maximum|Effluent<br>Maximum|Influent<br>Type|Effluent<br>Type|Influent<br>Type|Effluent<br>Type| ||1|0.00||0.0220005|||7371.23|||7.3574|7.3574||<0.1||||| ||2|0.00||0.0266006|||7870.78|||78.9930|78.9930||<0.1||||| ||3|0.00||0.0354005|||72.14|||78.5835|78.5835||<0.1||||| ||4|0.00||0.0224007|||72.37|||78.6132|78.6132||<0.1||||| ||5|0.80||0.0293006|||73.62|||78.3830|78.3830||<0.1||||| ||6|0.00||0.0334006|||72.473|||7.5698|7.5698||<0.1||||| ||7|0.00||0.0283007|||74.1|||78.4600|78.4600||<0.1||||| ||8|0.00||0.0400009|||7473.28|||78.3921|78.3921||<0.1||||| ||9|0.00||0.0275003|||7473.36|||78.5030|78.5030||<0.1||||| ||10|0.00||0.0349010|||74.2|||78.4020|78.4020||<0.1||||| ||11|0.00||0.0267007|||7271.45|||78.5010|78.5010||<0.1||||| ||12|0.00||0.0283006|||7372.48|||78.7050|78.7050||<0.1||||| ||13|0.00||0.0305006|||72.9|||8.20|8.20||<0.1||||| ||14|0.00||0.005|||73.6|||8.10|8.10||<0.1||||| ||15|0.00||0.007|||74.4|||8.40|8.40||<0.1||||| ||16|0.00||0.003|||74.6|||8.20|8.20||<0.1||||| ||17|0.00||0.006|||72.8|||8.20|8.20||<0.1||||| ||18|0.00||0.007|||73.1|||7.90|7.90||<0.1|87|3.2|261.2|1.4| ||19|0.00||0.007|||73.2|||7.70|7.70||<0.1||||| ||14|0.00||0.0251|||73.6|||7.80|7.80||<0.1||||| ||15|0.00||0.0333|||74.5|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||16|0.00||0.0266|||73.7|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||17|0.00||0.0325|||72.9|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||18|0.00||0.0289|||73.2|||7.50|7.50||<0.1|221|5.7|97|1.5| ||19|0.00||0.0320|||73.4|||7.60|7.60||<0.1||||| ||20|0.00||0.0381009|||7172.91|||78.7040|78.7040||<0.1||||| ||21|0.00||0.0262005|||7172.35|||78.6030|78.6030||<0.1||||| ||22|0.00||0.0399006|||72.45|||78.7040|78.7040||<0.1||||| ||23|0.00||0.0318006|||72.1|||78.6030|78.6030||<0.1||||| ||24|0.00||0.0251006|||72.2|||78.6030|78.6030||<0.1||||| ||25|1.50||0.0290005|||73.13|||78.5010|78.5010||<0.1|94|2.0|158|1.3| ||26|0.75||0.007|||74.8|||8.20|8.20||<0.1||||| ||26|0.75||0.0391|||74.6|||7.60|7.60||<0.1|187|3.4|82|2.6| ||27|0.00||0.0285009|||74.775|||78.6020|78.6020||<0.1||||| ||28|0.00||0.0224006|||74.37|||78.7030|78.7030||<0.1||||| ||29|0.00||0.0347011|||74.2|||78.7030|78.7030||<0.1||||| ||30|0.00||0.0242001|||7172.52|||78.6010|78.6010||<0.1||||| ||31||||||||||||||||| | Total | - | - | **0.030**Influent | - | - | Influent- | - | Minimum- | - | - | - | Monthly | - | inf.(mg/l) | - | inf.(mg/l) | | Precip. | - | - | Max:Effluent | - | - | Effluent- | - | Maximum- | - | - | - | Monthly | - | eff.(mg/l) | - | eff.(mg/l) | | **3.05** | - | - | **0.0400**Minimum | - | - | **79**- | - | Minimum- | - | - | - | Maximum | - | 30 day flow-weighted avg (1) | - | 30 day flow-weighted avg (1) | | - | - | - | MonthlyMaximum | - | - | Monthly Maximum- | - | Maximum- | - | - | - | Maximum | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | AverageMinimum | - | - | - | - | **7.4**- | - | - | - | **0.0** | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | -Maximum | - | - | - | - | **8.0**- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | **0.006** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | **75** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | **7.7** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | **8.5** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | Max: | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | **0.011** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | Monthly Maximum | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | Monthly | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | Monthly | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | Average | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||**0.0**|**201**|**4.4**|**88**|**2.1**| |||||||||||||||%Rem.->|**98#DIV/0!**|%Rem.->|**98#DIV/0!**| |||||||||||||30 Day Average<br>Quantity Loading (1)||**1.24**<br>lbs/day||**0.60**<br>lbs/day|| - (1) Refer to January 1994 edition of _DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)_ for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc - (2) If Tem NOTE: Refer to current SPDES permit for specific monitoring requirements. Sample type for temperature, PH and settleable solids is grab Page 2 of 4 |FACILI|TY MAIL|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Code)|TELEPHONE NUMBER|TELEPHONE NUMBER|TELEPHONE NUMBER|CHIEF OPERTATOR'S NAME<br>Leslie A Coon Jr<br>CHIEF OPERTATOR'S NAME|CERTIFICATION GRADE<br>3A| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |DAY|DATE|TOTAL PHOSPHORUS(mg/l)||Ultraviolet||FECAL COLIFORM||REMARKS<br>Enter any otheranyother comments, observations, operating problems, equipment failures, etc.||| |||Influent<br>Type|Effluent<br>Type|Contact|Effluent|Effluent<br>MF or MPN/100ml||||| |||||Minimum|Maximum|||||| ||1|||on|on|||||| ||2|||on|on|||||| ||3|||on|on|||||| ||4|||on|on|||||| ||5|||on|on|||||| ||6|||on|on|||||| ||7|||on|on|||||| ||8|||on|on|||||| ||9|||on|on|||||| ||10|||on|on|||||| ||11|||on|on|||||| ||12|||on|on|||||| ||13|||on|on|||||| ||14|||on|on|||||| ||15|||on|on|||||| ||16|||on|on|||||| ||17|||on|on|||||| ||18|||on|on||<4.1|||| ||19|||on|on|||||| ||20|||on|on|||||| ||21|||on|on|||||| ||22|||on|on|||||| ||23|||on|on|||||| ||24|||on|on|||||| ||25|||on|on||3|||| ||26|||on|on||<1|||| ||27|||on|on|||||| ||28|||on|on|||||| ||29|||on|on|||||| ||30|||on|on|||||| ||31|||on|on|||||| |||Influent mg/l<br>Effluent mg/l<br>30 day flow-weighted avg mean(1)||Minimum(1) <br>Maximum(1)<br>Monthly||**<13.5**<br>30 day geometric mean(1)||||| |||||**00**|**00**|||||| |||||**on.**|**on.**|||||| |||lbs/day||||||||| |||||||||||| (1) Refer to January 1994 edition of _DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)_ for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc NOTE: Refer to current SPDES permit for specific monitoring requirements. Sample type for temperature, PH and settleable solids is grab Page 3 of 4 |||||||||||Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control|Activated Sludge<br>Process Control<br>Fixed Media<br>Process Control||| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Day | Date | Influent | - | Influent | - | Influent | - | Influent | - | Recirculation | Media effluent | Mixed Liquor | - | - | Return Act. | | - | 1 | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Rate | settleable solids | S.S. (MLSS) | - | - | Waste Act. | | - | 2 | NH3 as N | - | DO | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/l | - | - | Sludge (RAS) | | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 Minutes | - | - | Sludge (WAS) | | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 minutes | - | - | M.G.D. | | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Settleable Sludge | - | - | lbs/day | | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Volume (SSV) ml/l | - | - | - | | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||M.G.D|ml/l|||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.0|||||||||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.0|||||||||||| ||||||8.1|||||||||||| ||||||8.0|||||||||||| ||||||8.4|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.1|||||||||||| ||||||7.4|||||||||||| ||||||11.7|||||||||||| ||||0.09||9.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||7.8|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||<0.05||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.0|||||||||||| ||||||7.7|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.4|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.4|||||||||||| ||||||7.8|||||||||||| ||||||11.3|||||||||||| ||||<0.05||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||9.1|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||9.1|||||||||||| ||||||9.9|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.0|||||||||||| ||||<0.05||9.5|||||||||||| ||||||9.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.4|||||||||||| |Min:|||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.8|||||||||||| ||||||7.0.1|||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |||**MAX:**||**MIN:**||||||||||||| ||||||**7.0**|||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |Quantity<br>Loading (1)<br>30 Day Average||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |||lbs/day||lbs/day||lbs/day||lbs/day||||||||| - (1) Refer to January 1994 edition of _DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)_ for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc Page 4 of 4 ## **Effect on Receiving Stream** |**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**|**Effect on Receiving Stream**| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |Name of Receiving Stream<br>Shanty Hollow Creek||||||| |Date<br>Station<br>Parameter<br>Result||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |Name and am<br>during month:<br>a.|ount of chemicals used in treatment process<br>gallons| |---|---| |b.|gallons| |c.|Gallons| |d.|lbs.| |e.|Gallons| |f.|Gallons| | Amount of ece | ctrical power consumed: | | a. Commercial | kilowatt hours | | b. Stand-by | - | | Amount of fuel | - | | a. Natural Gas | - | | b. Oil | - | | c. Gasoline | - | | d. Coal. | - | | e. Digester Ga | - | | f. propane | - | ||kilowatt hours| ||consumed:<br>cubic feet| ||gallons| ||gallons| ||tons| ||s<br>cubic feet| ||gallons| **==> picture [188 x 47] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Sludge removal from plant:<br>a. amount 5000<br>b. solid content<br>c. Volitile Solids Content<br>d. Disposal Site: Superior Sanitation<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> Other Solid Wastes: a. Screenings b. Grit c. Ashes d. e. f. g. Disposal Site ## Digester Gas Wasted Labor expended: ## **TRUCKED WASTE RECEIVED THIS MONTH** **==> picture [178 x 2620] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> 1- Septage, holding tank waste and<br>portable toilet waste<br> Total Max day<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> **==> picture [65 x 1512] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Volume (Gal.)<br>2- All other wastes<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> **==> picture [16120 x 4] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Max day<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> **==> picture [9 x 45] intentionally omitted <==** **----- Start of picture text -----**<br> Total Max day<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br> - **3-** Number of Part 364 haulers currently approved to transport wastes to this POTW - a.Septage,etc - b. All others | Name and am | ount of chemicals used in treatment process | m plant: | | during month: | Sludge removal fro | **5000** | | a. | a. amount | - | | - | gallons | - | | - | b. solid content | - | | - | gallons | - | | - | c. Volitile Solids C | - | | - | Gallons | - | | - | d. Disposal Site: | - | | - | lbs. | - | | - | Gallons | - | | - | Gallons | - | | - | ctrical power consumed: | - | | - | Other Solid Waste | - | | - | kilowatt hours | - | | - | a. Screenings | - | | - | kilowatt hours | - | | - | b. Grit | - | | - | c. Ashes | - | | - | consumed: | - | | - | d. | - | | - | cubic feet | - | | - | e. | - | | - | gallons | - | | - | f. | - | | - | gallons | - | | - | g. Disposal Site | - | | - | tons | - | | - | s | - | | - | cubic feet | - | | - | gallons | - | | - | Digester Gas Was | - | |||| |b.||ontent| |c.||Superior Sanitation| |d.||s:| |e.||| |f.||| Amount of ece a. Commercial b. Stand-by Amount of fuel a. Natural Gas b. Oil c. Gasoline d. Coal. e. Digester Ga f. propane |||| |||| |||| |||| |||| |||| |||ted| ## Labor expended: |Labor expended:|||| |---|---|---|---| |POSITION NAME|NUMBER FULL TIME|NUMBER PART TIME|TOTAL HOURS| |**Operator**|**240**||**240**| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| ||||| I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. ## Leslie A Coon Jr. 10/28/2025 Date Signature of Chief Operator or Designated Facility Representative 10/28/2025 Date Form Approved OMB No. 2040-0004 expires on 07/31/2026 ## **DMR Copy of Record** EPA may make all the information submitted through this form (including all attachments) available to the public without further notice to you. Do not use this online form to submit personal information (e.g., non-business cell phone number or non-business email address), confidential business information (CBI), or if you intend to assert a CBI claim on any of the submitted information. Pursuant to 40 CFR 2.203(a), EPA is providing you with notice that all CBI claims must be asserted at the time of submission. EPA cannot accommodate a late CBI claim to cover previously submitted information because efforts to protect the information are not administratively practicable since it may already be disclosed to the public. Although we do not foresee a need for persons to assert a claim of CBI based on the types of information requested in this form, if persons wish to assert a CBI claim we direct submitters to contact the NPDES eReporting Help Desk for further guidance. Please note that EPA may contact you after you submit this report for more information. This collection of information is approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (OMB Control No. 2040-0004). Responses to this collection of information are mandatory in accordance with this permit and EPA NPDES regulations 40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)(i). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information are estimated to average 2 hours per outfall. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden to the Regulatory Support Division Director, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2821T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. |**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|||||||||||| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | **Permit #:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | VILLAGE OF RED HOOK | - | - | - | - | **Facility:** | | **NY0271420** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7467 SOUTH BROADWAY | - | - | - | - | VILLAGE OF REDHOOK WWTP | | **Permittee:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | RED HOOK, NY 12571 | - | - | - | - | **Facility Location:** | | **Major:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | **01A-M** | - | - | - | - | US ROUTE 9 | | No | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | INTERNAL OUTFALL | - | - | - | - | RED HOOK, NY 12571 | | **Permittee Address:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **Permitted Feature:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | 01A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Internal Outfall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **Discharge:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |**_Report Dates & Status_**||||||||||||||||||||| |**Monitoring Period:**<br>**From 09/01/25 to 09/30/25**<br>||||||**DMR Due Date:**||||**10/28/25**||||||**Status:**<br>**NetDMR Validated**||||| |**_Considerations for Form Completion_**||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||| |**_Principal Executive Officer_**||||||||||||||||||||| |**First Name:**<br>Karen<br>**Last Name:**<br>Smythe||||||**Title:**||||Mayor|||||**Telephone:**<br>845-758-1081|||||| |**_No Data Indicator (NODI)_**||||||||||||||||||||| |**Form NODI:**<br>--||||||||||||||||||||| ||**Parameter**|**Monitoring Location**|**Season #**|**Param. NODI**|||**Quantity or Loading**||||||||**Quality or Concentration**|||**# of Ex.**|**Frequency of Analysis**|<br>**Sample Type**| |**Code**|**Name**|||||**Qualifier 1**|<br>**Value 1**|**Qualifier 2**|**Value 2**|<br>**Units**|**Qualifier 1**|<br>**Value 1**|**Qualifier 2**|<br>**Value 2**|**Qualifier 3**|<br>**Value 3**|**Units**|||| |00011<br>**X**|**Temperature, water deg. fahrenheit**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|79.0|15 - degF||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|70.0 DAILY MX|15 - degF||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00300|**Oxygen, dissolved [DO]**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||=|7.0|||||19 - mg/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||>=|7.0 DAILY MN|||||19 - mg/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00310<br>**X**|**BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|5.7|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|5.0 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00400|**pH**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||=|7.4|||=|8.0|12 - SU||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||>=|6.5 MINIMUM|||<=|8.5 MAXIMUM|12 - SU||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00530|**Solids, total suspended**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|2.6|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|10.0 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00545|**Solids, settleable**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||<|0.1|25 - mL/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|0.1 DAILY MX|25 - mL/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00610|**Nitrogen, ammonia total [as N]**|1 - Effluent Gross|1|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|0.09|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|0.98 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |50050|**Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**|=|0.03|||03 - MGD|||||||||99/99 - Continuous|RC - Recorder(auto)| ||||||**Permit Req.**|<=|0.05 MO AVG|||03 - MGD|||||||||99/99 - Continuous|RC - Recorder(auto)| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |50060|**Chlorine, total residual**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**|||||||||||||||| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|0.03 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||9 - Conditional Monitoring - Not Required This Period||||| |74055|**Coliform, fecal general**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||<|1.0|<|1.0|13 - #/100mL||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||<=|200.0 30DA GEO|<=|400.0 7 DA GEO|13 - #/100mL||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| |||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||| **Value NODI** ## _**Submission Note**_ If a parameter row does not contain any values for the Sample nor Effluent Trading, then none of the following fields will be submitted for that row: Units, Number of Excursions, Frequency of Analysis, and Sample Type. _**Edit Check Errors**_ ||**Parameter**|**Monitoring Location**|**Field**|**Type**|**Description**|**Description**||**Acknowledge**| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |**Code**|**Name**|||||||| |00011|Temperature, water deg. fahrenheit|1 - Effluent Gross|Quality or Concentration Sample Value 3|Soft|The provided sample value is outside the permit limit.Please verify that the value you have provided is correct.|||Yes| |00310|BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C|1 - Effluent Gross|Quality or Concentration Sample Value 3|Soft|The provided sample value is outside the permit limit.Please verify that the value you have provided is correct.|||Yes| |**_Comments_**||||||||| |||||||||| |**_Attachments_**||||||||| ||||**Name**|||**Type**|**Size**|| |092025VillageofRedHookWWFORsRoNE.xlsx||||||xlsx|406825.0|| |**_Report Last Saved By_**||||||||| |**_VILLAGE OF RED HOOK_**||||||||| |User:<br>Name:<br>E-Mail:<br>Date/Time:||COONJ1974<br>Leslie Coon<br>lcoon@jcoinc.org<br>2025-10-28 15:22 (Time Zone: -04:00)||||||| |**_Report Last Signed By_**||||||||| |User:<br>Name:<br>E-Mail:<br>Date/Time:||COONJ1974<br>Leslie Coon<br>lcoon@jcoinc.org<br>2025-10-28 15:22 (Time Zone: -04:00)||||||| Form Approved OMB No. 2040-0004 expires on 07/31/2026 ## **DMR Copy of Record** EPA may make all the information submitted through this form (including all attachments) available to the public without further notice to you. Do not use this online form to submit personal information (e.g., non-business cell phone number or non-business email address), confidential business information (CBI), or if you intend to assert a CBI claim on any of the submitted information. Pursuant to 40 CFR 2.203(a), EPA is providing you with notice that all CBI claims must be asserted at the time of submission. EPA cannot accommodate a late CBI claim to cover previously submitted information because efforts to protect the information are not administratively practicable since it may already be disclosed to the public. Although we do not foresee a need for persons to assert a claim of CBI based on the types of information requested in this form, if persons wish to assert a CBI claim we direct submitters to contact the NPDES eReporting Help Desk for further guidance. Please note that EPA may contact you after you submit this report for more information. This collection of information is approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (OMB Control No. 2040-0004). Responses to this collection of information are mandatory in accordance with this permit and EPA NPDES regulations 40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)(i). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information are estimated to average 2 hours per outfall. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden to the Regulatory Support Division Director, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2821T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. |**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|**_Permit_**|||||||||||||||| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | **Permit #:** | - | - | - | - | - | **Permittee:** | - | - | - | VILLAGE OF RED HOOK | - | - | - | - | **Facility:** | | **NY0271420** | - | - | - | - | - | **Permittee Address:** | - | - | - | 7467 SOUTH BROADWAY | - | - | - | - | VILLAGE OF REDHOOK WWTP | | - | - | - | - | - | - | **Discharge:** | - | - | - | RED HOOK, NY 12571 | - | - | - | - | **Facility Location:** | | **Major:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | **01B-M** | - | - | - | - | US ROUTE 9 | | No | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | INTERNAL OUTFALL | - | - | - | - | RED HOOK, NY 12571 | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **Permitted Feature:** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | 01B | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | Internal Outfall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |**_Report Dates & Status_**||||||||||||||||||||| |**Monitoring Period:**<br>**From 09/01/25 to 09/30/25**<br>||||||**DMR Due Date:**||||**10/28/25**||||||**Status:**<br>**NetDMR Validated**||||| |**_Considerations for Form Completion_**||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||| |**_Principal Executive Officer_**||||||||||||||||||||| |**First Name:**<br>Karen<br>**Last Name:**<br>Smythe||||||**Title:**||||Mayor|||||**Telephone:**<br>845-758-1081|||||| |**_No Data Indicator (NODI)_**||||||||||||||||||||| |**Form NODI:**<br>--||||||||||||||||||||| ||**Parameter**|**Monitoring Location**|**Season #**|**Param. NODI**|||**Quantity or Loading**||||||||**Quality or Concentration**|||**# of Ex.**|**Frequency of Analysis**|<br>**Sample Type**| |**Code**|**Name**|||||**Qualifier 1**|<br>**Value 1**|**Qualifier 2**|**Value 2**|<br>**Units**|**Qualifier 1**|<br>**Value 1**|**Qualifier 2**|<br>**Value 2**|**Qualifier 3**|<br>**Value 3**|**Units**|||| |00011<br>**X**|**Temperature, water deg. fahrenheit**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|75.0|15 - degF|1|01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|70.0 DAILY MX|15 - degF||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00300|**Oxygen, dissolved [DO]**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||=|7.0|||||19 - mg/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||>=|7.0 DAILY MN|||||19 - mg/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00310|**BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|3.2|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|5.0 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00400|**pH**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||=|7.7|||=|8.5|12 - SU||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||>=|6.5 MINIMUM|||<=|8.5 MAXIMUM|12 - SU||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00530|**Solids, total suspended**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||=|1.4|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|10.0 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00545|**Solids, settleable**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||||<|0.1|25 - mL/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|0.1 DAILY MX|25 - mL/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |00610|**Nitrogen, ammonia total [as N]**|1 - Effluent Gross|1|--|**Sample**||||||||||<|0.05|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|0.98 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |50050|**Flow, in conduit or thru treatment plant**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**|=|0.006|||03 - MGD|||||||||99/99 - Continuous|RC - Recorder(auto)| ||||||**Permit Req.**|<=|0.025 MO AVG|||03 - MGD|||||||||99/99 - Continuous|RC - Recorder(auto)| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||||||| |50060|**Chlorine, total residual**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**|||||||||||||||| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||||<=|0.03 DAILY MX|19 - mg/L||01/01 - Daily|GR - Grab| ||||||**Value NODI**|||||||||||9 - Conditional Monitoring - Not Required This Period||||| |74055|**Coliform, fecal general**|1 - Effluent Gross|0|--|**Sample**||||||||=|3.5|=|4.1|13 - #/100mL||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| ||||||**Permit Req.**||||||||<=|200.0 30DA GEO|<=|400.0 7 DA GEO|13 - #/100mL||01/30 - Monthly|GR - Grab| |||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||| **Value NODI** ## _**Submission Note**_ If a parameter row does not contain any values for the Sample nor Effluent Trading, then none of the following fields will be submitted for that row: Units, Number of Excursions, Frequency of Analysis, and Sample Type. _**Edit Check Errors**_ ||**Parameter**|**Monitoring Location**|**Field**|**Type**|**Description**|**Description**||**Acknowledge**| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |**Code**|**Name**|||||||| |00011|Temperature, water deg. fahrenheit|1 - Effluent Gross|Quality or Concentration Sample Value 3|Soft|The provided sample value is outside the permit limit.Please verify that the value you have provided is correct.|||Yes| |**_Comments_**||||||||| |||||||||| |**_Attachments_**||||||||| ||||**Name**|||**Type**|**Size**|| |092025VillageofRedHookRoNE2.xlsx||||||xlsx|14101.0|| |092025VillageofRedHookWWFORsRoNE.xlsx||||||xlsx|407411.0|| |**_Report Last Saved By_**||||||||| |**_VILLAGE OF RED HOOK_**||||||||| |User:<br>Name:<br>E-Mail:<br>Date/Time:||COONJ1974<br>Leslie Coon<br>lcoon@jcoinc.org<br>2025-10-28 15:42 (Time Zone: -04:00)||||||| |**_Report Last Signed By_**||||||||| |User:<br>Name:<br>E-Mail:<br>Date/Time:||COONJ1974<br>Leslie Coon<br>lcoon@jcoinc.org<br>2025-10-28 15:43 (Time Zone: -04:00)|||||||

References

This document cites or incorporates the following separate documents:

Referenced by

These other documents cite or incorporate this one: