Red Hook WatchIndependent Community Resource

Sewer Department Report — September 2025

2 versions2025-10-06attached document

Latest version

Village of Red Hook SEWER DEPARTMENT REPORT September 2025

We had an operational meeting on Sept. 10 & 25 where we reviewed sewer operations.

H2O’s software platform, Waterly, is now up and running for the Village of Red Hook. This will enable the team to have ready access to all of the testing data in real time.

We discussed a list of equipment and supplies needed for the Sewer plant. Karen will review and authorize these purchases.

At the “old plant”, Plant 1B, a pump has been installed in the EQ tank to allow for better management of the flow. Now that the biology or “bugs” are growing well, there is a need to maintain the right amount which means sometimes an excess needs to be “wasted”. With the added pump in the EQ tank, that will allow for wasting to occur. The West side aeration tank is waiting for a valve replacement so that the return activated sludge can function on this side. This valve replacement is scheduled for the week of 9/29. The East side is currently handling all the flow. Some adjustment to the floats in the sand filter is needed.

The new plant, Plant 1A, the plant is operating smoothly. It functions best when it has consistent, steady flow through the plant. Wasting of the biology or “bugs” needs some adjustment and the sand filter floats also need some adjustments.

H2O did discover that our BOD testing, since June, has not been in compliance. The test required changes seasonally so from June to Oct, a different test is required. This change was made due to human error. H2O contacted DEC and has reported our non-compliance. Everything else has been in compliance. While the other test results would indicate that the BOD test should have been in compliance, there is not a calculation that can confirm that.

There was a significant toilet leak in one of the apartment buildings on the sewer system. Fortunately the water meter for that building had been changed to a cell meter so the location was isolated quickly. All the extra water flowed into the system to the WWTP which caused the extra EQ to fill up. This reiterates the need for the expanded EQ tank capacity to allow for disruptions in the system.

We reviewed the proposed alarm system from Vector and the team determined that we could set up our own system with notification via cell service that would function just as well and would be less expensive. Next steps to be discussed at our next meeting.

We received no odor complaints that tied to the WWTP in the month of September. The last WWTP odor complaint we have received was in early May.

Rural water is scheduled to meet with the Sewer team in mid-November to help the team begin developing an asset management plan.

Changes between versions

2025-10-062025-10-06
clerical+00

No substantive changes were made to the September 2025 Sewer Department Report.

Show red-line diff
## Village of Red Hook SEWER DEPARTMENT REPORT September 2025 We had an operational meeting on Sept. 10 & 25 where we reviewed sewer operations. H2O’s software platform, Waterly, is now up and running for the Village of Red Hook. This will enable the team to have ready access to all of the testing data in real time. We discussed a list of equipment and supplies needed for the Sewer plant. Karen will review and authorize these purchases. At the “old plant”, Plant 1B, a pump has been installed in the EQ tank to allow for better management of the flow. Now that the biology or “bugs” are growing well, there is a need to maintain the right amount which means sometimes an excess needs to be “wasted”. With the added pump in the EQ tank, that will allow for wasting to occur. The West side aeration tank is waiting for a valve replacement so that the return activated sludge can function on this side. This valve replacement is scheduled for the week of 9/29. The East side is currently handling all the flow. Some adjustment to the floats in the sand filter is needed. The new plant, Plant 1A, the plant is operating smoothly. It functions best when it has consistent, steady flow through the plant. Wasting of the biology or “bugs” needs some adjustment and the sand filter floats also need some adjustments. H2O did discover that our BOD testing, since June, has not been in compliance. The test required changes seasonally so from June to Oct, a different test is required. This change was made due to human error. H2O contacted DEC and has reported our non-compliance. Everything else has been in compliance. While the other test results would indicate that the BOD test should have been in compliance, there is not a calculation that can confirm that. There was a significant toilet leak in one of the apartment buildings on the sewer system. Fortunately the water meter for that building had been changed to a cell meter so the location was isolated quickly. All the extra water flowed into the system to the WWTP which caused the extra EQ to fill up. This reiterates the need for the expanded EQ tank capacity to allow for disruptions in the system. We reviewed the proposed alarm system from Vector and the team determined that we could set up our own system with notification via cell service that would function just as well and would be less expensive. Next steps to be discussed at our next meeting. We received no odor complaints that tied to the WWTP in the month of September. The last WWTP odor complaint we have received was in early May. Rural water is scheduled to meet with the Sewer team in mid-November to help the team begin developing an asset management plan.

References

This document cites or incorporates the following separate documents:

  • 2026-04-09DEC Report Noncompliance Event — SPDES Permit Violation
    — pinned to version dated 2026-04-09
    Document B is a formal DEC noncompliance report filed in response to the BOD testing violation mentioned in Document A; they are separate regulatory documents in different slots (operational report vs. compliance filing).
  • 2025-11-17EPA Discharge Monitoring Report — October 2025
    — pinned to version dated 2025-11-17
    Document A is an internal operational report; Document B is the formal NYS DEC SPDES compliance report for the same facility and month—two separate documents serving different regulatory slots (internal operations vs. state filing).
  • 2025-11-13NYS DEC Operation Report — Facility 1
    Document A is an internal operational report on September activities; Document B is a separate NYS DEC regulatory compliance report for the same facility—different documents serving different slots (internal operations vs. regulatory filing).
  • 2025-11-13NYS DEC Operation Report — Facility 2
    Document A is an internal operational report on sewer department activities; Document B is a separate NYS DEC regulatory compliance report on the same facility—different documents serving different slots (internal operations vs. external regulatory reporting).
  • 2025-11-13EPA Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
    Document A is an operational status report on sewer department activities; Document B is a separate regulatory compliance filing (EPA DMR); they are distinct board artifacts linked by subject matter, not revisions of the same instrument.
  • 2025-11-13Wastewater Facility Operation Report for September 2025 and Laboratory Test Results
    Both documents report on the same wastewater facility operations for September 2025; Document B is the formal state-required SPEDES permit report form containing the detailed laboratory data underlying the operational narrative in Document A.
  • 2025-11-17DEC Noncompliance Report Form
    Document A is a monthly operational report; Document B is a formal DEC noncompliance filing triggered by findings in that report—they are separate board/regulatory documents linked by subject matter, not revisions of the same instrument.
  • 2025-09-182025 09 18
    Document B appears to be a working document or draft related to WWTP operations, while Document A is a completed September 2025 sewer department report; they are separate artifacts in different stages/formats rather than one being a revision of the other.

Referenced by

These other documents cite or incorporate this one:

  • 2025-11-17EPA Discharge Monitoring Report — October 2025
    Document B is a narrative operational summary report; Document A is the formal SPDES regulatory monitoring report for the same facility and month—they are separate board documents serving different purposes (operational discussion vs. regulatory compliance filing).
  • 2025-11-17DEC Noncompliance Report Form
    Document A is a DEC noncompliance report form filed on 9/24/25 for a specific permit violation event; Document B is a monthly operational report from 10/6/25 that references and discusses the same noncompliance incident but serves a different slot (internal departmental reporting vs. regulatory filing).

Recurring pattern

These other chains use the same template but are separate decisions: