Red Hook WatchIndependent Community Resource

Facility 2 — August 2025

↑Meetings/Document history/chain_2210
1 versions2025-10-06attached document

Versions

  1. 12025-10-06
    Facility 2 — August 2025
    attached document

Document

Open original PDFView version history →Meeting on 2025-10-06 →

92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c

Page 1 of 4

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water

|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|92-15-7 (11/95)-- 27c New York State|Department of Environmental Conserva Division of Water|Department of Environmental Conserva Division of Water|Department of Environmental Conserva Division of Water|tion|tion|||Page 1 of 4|Page 1 of 4| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |SPEDES PRMIT NO. FACILITY WASTEWATER FACILITY OPERATION REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF: August 2025 FACILITY NAME NY-0271420 Village of Red Hook|||||||||OWNER same|||FACILITY L||OCATION Red Hook, NY|||| |DAY|DATE|Daily Precip. in/day|VOLUME OF SEWAGE TREATED|||TEMPERATURE(°F)|||pH(S.U.)|||Settleable Solids(ml/l)||B.O.D.5.(mg/l)||Suspended Solids(mg/l)|| ||||Inst.Max. MGD|Dly Average. MGD|Inst.Min. MGD|Influent (2)|Effluent (2)|Influent Minimum|Influent Maximum|Effluent Minimum|Effluent Maximum|Influent Maximum|Effluent Maximum|Influent Type|Effluent Type|Influent Type|Effluent Type| ||1|2.60||0.002||75|75.9|7.56|7.56|7.98|7.98|25.0|<0.1||||| ||2|0.00||0.007||73|70.5|7.57|7.57|8.31|8.31|32|<0.1||||| ||3|0.00||0.002||73.1|71.2|7.59|7.59|8.40|8.40|38|<0.1||||| ||4|0.00||0.007||3|72.4|7.54|7.54|8.37|8.37|39|<0.1||||| ||5|0.00||0.004||74.2|73.9|7.61|7.61|8.10|8.10|30|<0.1||||| ||6|0.00||0.007||78.1|73.1|7.52|7.52|8.02|8.02|30|<0.1||||| ||7|0.00||0.006||76.2|72.4|7.41|7.41|8.30|8.30|21|<0.1||||| ||8|0.00||0.003||74.3|72.1|7.25|7.25|7.90|7.90|27|<0.1||||| ||9|0.00||0.006||69.8|70.7|7.70|7.70|8.40|8.40|28|<0.1||||| ||10|0.00||0.006||69.4|70|7.71|7.71|8.00|8.00|35|<0.1||||| ||11|0.00||0.006||69|71.3|7.52|7.52|7.80|7.80|30|<0.1||||| ||12|0.00||0.002||68.7|71.9|7.41|7.41|7.40|7.40|30|<0.1||||| ||13|0.50||0.007||68.9|71.4|7.48|7.48|7.68|7.68|47|<0.1|||119|7.8| ||14|0.00||0.005||67.1|71.8|7.82|7.82|7.49|7.49|43|<0.1||||| ||15|0.00||0.008||68.4|71.3|7.61|7.61|7.78|7.78|41|<0.1||||| ||16|0.00||0.003|||80.2|||8.30|8.30||<0.1||||| ||17|0.00||0.005|||78.4|||8.00|8.00||<0.1||||| ||18|0.00||0.006||68|78.7|7.68|7.68|7.86|7.86|42|<0.1||||| ||19|0.00||0.004||67.4|71.2|||8.27|8.27|40|<0.1||||| ||20|0.30||0.004||73.5|73.8|7.59|7.59|8.31|8.31|22|<0.1||||| ||21|0.70||0.011||76.5|74.9|7.63|7.63|8.26|8.26|27|<0.1||||| ||22|0.00||0.008|||76.8|||7.38|7.38|38|<0.1||||| ||23|0.00||0.006||76.2|75.3|||7.43|7.43|35|<0.1||||| ||24|0.00||0.005||76.5|74.8|||8.37|8.37|39|<0.1||||| ||25|0.00||0.007||76.3|75.2|7.91|7.91|8.16|8.16|30|<0.1||||| ||26|0.00||0.002||76.9|74|||8.17|8.17|35|<0.1||||| ||27|0.00||0.008||72.9|73|7.65|7.65|8.31|8.31|125|<0.1||||| ||28|0.00||0.013||73.3|72.4|7.23|7.23|7.99|7.99|85|<0.1|||630|8.0| ||29|0.00||0.005||73|72.7|7.57|7.57|8.04|8.04|10|<0.1||||| ||30|0.00||0.005||72.5|71.1|7.85|7.85|8.00|8.00|22|<0.1||||| ||31|0.00||0.007||71|68.9|7.63|7.63|7.97|7.97|30|<0.1||||| | Total | 0.006 | - | - | Influent | - | Minimum | Maximum | - | - | Monthly | - | inf.(mg/l) | - | inf.(mg/l) | | Precip. | Max: | - | - | Effluent | - | 7.2 | Minimum | - | - | Monthly | - | eff.(mg/l) | - | eff.(mg/l) | | 4.10 | 0.013 | - | - | 78 | - | - | Maximum | - | - | Maximum | - | Daily Max | - | Daily Max | | - | Monthly | - | - | 80 | - | - | 7.9 | - | - | Maximum | - | - | - | - | | - | Average | - | - | Monthly Maximum | - | - | 7.4 | - | - | 125.0 | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8.4 | - | - | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Monthly | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||0.0||| 630| 8.0| |||||||||||||||%Rem.->||%Rem.->|99| |||||||||||||30 Day Average QuantityLoading (1)||lbs/day||0.88 lbs/day||

(1) Refer to January 1994 edition of DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum,

minimum, percent removal, etc

(2) If Tem

NOTE: Refer to current SPDES permit for specific monitoring requirements. Sample type for temperature, PH and settleable solids is grab

Page 2 of 4

|FACIL|ITY MAIL|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Red Hook, NY 1257|ING ADDRESS (Street, City, Zip Red Hook, NY 1257|Code) 1|Code) 1|TELEPHONE NUMBER|TELEPHONE NUMBER|TELEPHONE NUMBER|Leslie A Coon Jr CHIEF OPERTATOR'S NAME|CERTIFICATION GRADE 3A| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |DAY|DATE|TOTAL PHOSPHOR|US(mg/l)|Ultraviolet||FECALCOLIFORM||REMARKS Enter anyother comments, observations, operating problems, equipment failures, etc.||| |||Influent Type|Effluent Type|Bank|Bank|Effluent MF or MPN/100ml||||| |||||1|2|||||| ||1|||15.7|100.0|||||| ||2|||0.9|100.0|||||| ||3|||0.8|100.0|||||| ||4|||0.0|100.0|||||| ||5|||0.0|100.0|||||| ||6|||0.0|100.0|||||| ||7|||0.0|100.0|||||| ||8|||12.6|100.0|||||| ||9|||12.0|100.0|||||| ||10|||19.9|100.0|||||| ||11|||15.9|100.0|||||| ||12|||15.1|100.0|||||| ||13|||20.3|100.0||10|||| ||14|||20.7|100.0|||||| ||15|||14.6|100.0|||||| ||16|||||||||| ||17|||19.7|100.0|||||| ||18|||11.7|100.0|||||| ||19|||12.8|100.0|||||| ||20|||12.4|100.0|||||| ||21|||20.5|100.0|||||| ||22|||13.7|100.0|||||| ||23|||12.7|100.0|||||| ||24|||12.9|100.0|||||| ||25|||12.3|100.0|||Odor complaint called in, Post investigation the source was a contractor laying fresh asphalt||| ||26|||13.2|100.0|||||| ||27|||21.4|100.0|||||| ||28|||61.5|100.0||<10|||| ||29|||63.6|100.0|||||| ||30|||53.7|100.0|||||| ||31|||70.2|88.2|||||| |||Influent mg/l 30 day flow-weighte|Effluent mg/l d avg mean(1)|Minimum(1) Maximum(1) Monthly||<10 30 day geometric mean(1)||||| |||||00|1000|||||| |||||.|.|||||| |||lbs/day|||||||||

(1) Refer to January 1994 edition of DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc

NOTE: Refer to current SPDES permit for specific monitoring requirements. Sample type for temperature, PH and settleable solids is grab

Page 3 of 4

|||||||||||Activated Sludge Process Control Fixed Media Process Control|Activated Sludge Process Control Fixed Media Process Control|Activated Sludge Process Control Fixed Media Process Control|Activated Sludge Process Control Fixed Media Process Control|Activated Sludge Process Control Fixed Media Process Control||| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Day | Date | Influent | - | Influent | - | Influent | - | Influent | - | Recirculation | Media effluent | Mixed Liquor | - | - | Return Act. | | - | 1 | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Effluent | - | Rate | settleable solids | S.S. (MLSS) | - | - | Waste Act. | | - | 2 | NH3 as N | - | DO | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/l | - | - | Sludge (RAS) | | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 Minutes | - | - | Sludge (WAS) | | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 30 minutes | - | - | M.G.D. | | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Settleable Sludge | - | - | lbs/day | | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Volume (SSV) ml/l | - | - | - | | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||M.G.D|ml/l|||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||8.1|||||||||||| ||||||8.0|||||||||||| ||||||9.0|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.9|||||||||||| ||||||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| ||||||8.0|||||||||||| ||||<0.05||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.7|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.9|||||||||||| ||||||7.7|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.0|||||||||||| ||||||7.8|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.8|||||||||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||7.3|||||||||||| ||||||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||7.2|||||||||||| ||||||7.4|||||||||||| ||||0.149||7.6|||||||||||| ||||||8.3|||||||||||| ||||||8.4|||||||||||| ||||||8.2|||||||||||| |||MAX:||MIN:||||||||||||| ||||0.149||7.0|||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||| |Quantity Loading (1) 30 Day Average||||||||||||||||| |||lbs/day||lbs/day||lbs/day||lbs/day|||||||||

(1) Refer to January 1994 edition of DMR Manual for completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for procedures to calculate loadings, arithmetic mean, geometric Mean, maximum, minimum, percent removal, etc

Page 4 of 4

Effect on Receiving Stream

Effect on Receiving StreamEffect on Receiving StreamEffect on Receiving StreamEffect on Receiving StreamEffect on Receiving StreamEffect on Receiving StreamEffect on Receiving Stream
Name of Receiving Stream
Shanty Hollow Creek
Date
Station
Parameter
Result

TRUCKED WASTE RECEIVED THIS MONTH

==> picture [164 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

1- Septage, holding tank waste and portable toilet waste Total Max day ----- End of picture text -----

  • Volume (Gal.) 2- All other wastes

==> picture [111 x 5] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Total Max day ----- End of picture text -----

  • 3- Number of Part 364 haulers currently approved to transport wastes to this POTW

  • a.Septage,etc

  • b. All others

|Name and am during month: a.|ount of chemicals used in treatment process gallons| |---|---| |b.|gallons| |c.|Gallons| |d.|lbs.| |e.|Gallons| |f.|Gallons| | Amount of ece | ctrical power consumed: | | a. Commercial | - | | b. Stand-by | kilowatt hours | | Amount of fuel | - | | a. Natural Gas | - | | b. Oil | - | | c. Gasoline | - | | d. Coal. | - | | e. Digester Ga | - | | f. propane | - | ||kilowatt hours| ||consumed:

cubic feet| ||gallons| ||gallons| ||tons| ||s cubic feet| ||gallons|

Sludge removal from plant: a. amount b. solid content c. Volitile Solids Content d. Disposal Site: Superior Sanitation Other Solid Wastes: a. Screenings b. Grit c. Ashes d. e. f.

g. Disposal Site

Digester Gas Wasted

Labor expended:

Labor expended:
POSITION NAMENUMBER FULL TIMENUMBER PART TIMETOTAL HOURS
Operator6262
Chief Operator3131

I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law.

Leslie A Coon Jr.

Signature of Chief Operator or Designated Facility Representative

9/24/2025 Date

Changes between versions

2025-05-08→2025-05-12
substantive change+8 −24

The document title and scope changed from a multi-departmental monthly report to a single-department Building Department report.

  • Title changed from 'Village of Red Hook Sewer Department Monthly Report — April 2025' to 'Building Department Monthly Trustee's Report — April 2025'
  • Document date changed from '2025-05-08' to '2025-05-12'
  • Removed 'Village of Red Hook Speed Limit Initiative Monthly Report April 2025'
  • Removed 'Village of Red Hook Town of Red Hook Greenway and Trails Committee Monthly Report April 2025'
  • Removed 'Village of Red Hook Climate Smart Communities Monthly Report April 2025'
Show red-line diff
## Village of Red Hook Sewer Department Monthly Report April 2025 In April, the new operators created an action list to address repairs, trace complaints to root causes, and began weekly instead of monthly testing. They uncovered multiple design and — “ ” operational issues —many components were broken or had never functioned. As a “pocket plant,” everything was supposed to be included, but there was no treatment on Day 1, so chlorine was used for disinfection. Dechlorinating tabs arrived mid-month and are now in use. EQ tank pumps were running at full capacity, possibly overloading the plant and washing out the — — microbial community. There was no flow control —just zero or maximum —prompting a recommendation for a larger EQ tank and smaller pumps. The current tank only works if everything functions perfectly, leaving no room for error. Aeration was insufficient, so more blowers were added. In the clarifier, sludge wasn ’ t returning properly, causing buildup and blowouts. With added pumps, sludge movement improved, clarifying the water, though return pipes still clog. MLSS held steady at 1,000 mg/L — sufficient for microbial growth. The weirs weren ’ t level due to a tilted tank, causing uneven flow. Delaware adjusted them to a 60/40 balance, better than before, but true 50/50 won't be possible until the tank is leveled. Uneven flow has been overloading the sand filters. Their auto controls weren ’ t working, and manual use trips breakers. Sand filters need replacement about every two years. UV filters were scheduled for replacement under a new contract. Sand filters will be addressed once the old plant is back online. Major repairs are planned for the week of May 12. Although the microbial community began to recover in April, the plant still didn ’ t meet ammonia limits and seems to be receiving more pollutants than it was designed to handle. Pumps were removed from automatic mode to prevent washing out microbes and are now operated manually. A SCADA system would be needed to automate them safely. I raised the possibility of a sewer-use area moratorium due to community concerns and the plant ’ s current instability, even though it ’ s under capacity. No specific criteria for triggering a moratorium were provided, only that it would be a last-resort measure. The mayor and Robert Flores (Delaware sewer operator) hosted a second community info session, with a third scheduled for **Thursday, June 5.** The Sewer team meets every other Friday. If you have concerns, comments, etc. related to the WWTP or the Sewer Use Area please do not hesitate to reach out. Village of Red Hook Speed Limit Initiative Monthly Report April 2025 The engineer is reaching out to colleague for best advice in how to move forward Village of Red Hook Town of Red Hook Greenway and Trails Committee Monthly Report April 2025 The April meeting covered proposed the Winnakee Land Trust Ribbon Cutting day for the expanded Saw Kill trail which was moved to June 7[th] (national trails day) from April 26[th] which was Rails to Trails Conservancy Trails Day due to DEC scheduling conflicts. It also covered how the committee will be involved in the Tour De Red Hook which happened May 4[th] . The ’ – committee agreed that they d provide swag free stickers, safety information, trail information and use it as an opportunity to promote all the trails and even though this ride was using the Cookingham Farm trails specifically. They agreed to order kid and adult reflective vests, reflective stickers with the trails logo and trail maps all of which would be free to those in the community who participated. The committee is actively working on promoting the trails as off-road and safer options for traveling between schools and neighborhoods and working through educational material to send out regarding the “ rules of the roads/trails ” such as road safety, looking both ways, walking against traffic, riding with traffic, etc. Village of Red Hook Climate Smart Communities Monthly Report April 2025 April ’ s meeting was devoted to collecting suggestions of pledge elements from the CSC Program to start to prioritize them for Board Approval. However, the taskforce must be formally created with authority. There were many Action items from each Pledge Element that would be helpful. The Tour de Red Hook Bike ride was discussed in relation to PE 6 (climate smart land use). It offers a great opportunity to gather more data on street and trail usage and requests directly from our residents. The Repair Café was a well-attended event that ’ happens quarterly with the Town s CAC at The Red Hook Community Center – the CSC participated via engagement with residents about the upcoming compost program. We ’ even had a few people sign up for it – however, I think they re town residents. But it is always great to engage with chat with the members of our community. The website page has been created and designed and waiting for final uploading to our site and Sign Painter Colin Packard has created a few renderings of the big sign for the shed which would also include the Village Logo as well as acknowledge the County for their financial sponsorship. I also want to thank Polina Malikin for her work on the program ’ s logo.
2025-05-12→2025-05-12
substantive change+8 −12

The document has been completely replaced with a report covering different municipal departments.

  • Title changed from 'Building Department Monthly Trustee's Report — April 2025' to 'Sewer Department Monthly Report — April 2025'
  • Substantive content change: The Sewer Department report regarding plant operations and repairs was removed and replaced with reports for the 'Greenway and Trails Committee' and 'Climate Smart Communities'
  • Removed all technical details regarding the Sewer Department, including mentions of 'Delaware' operators, 'MLSS' levels, and 'UV filters'
  • Added section: 'Village of Red Hook Greenway and Trails Committee Monthly Report April 2025' regarding the Winnakee Land Trust Ribbon Cutting and Tour De Red Hook
  • Added section: 'Village of Red Hook Climate Smart Communities Monthly Report April 2025' regarding CSC Program pledge elements and the Repair Café
Show red-line diff
## Village of Red Hook SewerSpeed DepartmentLimit Initiative Monthly Report April 2025 InThe engineer is reaching out to colleague for best advice in how to move forward Village of Red Hook Town of Red Hook Greenway and Trails Committee Monthly Report April, 2025 The April meeting covered proposed the newWinnakee operatorsLand createdTrust anRibbon actionCutting listday for the expanded Saw Kill trail which was moved to addressJune repairs,7[th] trace(national complaintstrails day) from April 26[th] which was Rails to rootTrails causes,Conservancy and began weekly instead of monthly testing. They uncovered multiple design and operational issues—many components were broken or had never functioned. As a “pocket plant,” everything was supposed to be included, but there was no treatment onTrails Day 1, so chlorine was used for disinfection. Dechlorinating tabs arrived mid-month and are now in use. EQ tank pumps were running at full capacity, possibly overloading the plant and washing out the microbial community. There was no flow control—just zero or maximum—prompting a recommendation for a larger EQ tank and smaller pumps. The current tank only works if everything functions perfectly, leaving no room for error. Aeration was insufficient, so more blowers were added. In the clarifier, sludge wasn’t returning properly, causing buildup and blowouts. With added pumps, sludge movement improved, clarifying the water, though return pipes still clog. MLSS held steady at 1,000 mg/L—sufficient for microbial growth. The weirs weren’t level due to aDEC tiltedscheduling tank, causing uneven flowconflicts. DelawareIt adjustedalso themcovered to a 60/40 balance, better than before, but true 50/50 won't be possible untilhow the tank is leveled. Uneven flow has been overloading the sand filters. Their auto controls weren’t working, and manual use trips breakers. Sand filters need replacement about every two years. UV filters were scheduled for replacement under a new contract. Sand filterscommittee will be addressedinvolved oncein the oldTour plantDe isRed backHook onlinewhich happened May 4[th] . MajorThe repairscommittee areagreed plannedthat forthey’d provide swag – free stickers, safety information, trail information and use it as an opportunity to promote all the weektrails and even though this ride was using the Cookingham Farm trails specifically. They agreed to order kid and adult reflective vests, reflective stickers with the trails logo and trail maps all of May 12. Although the microbial community began to recover in April, the plant still didn’t meet ammonia limits and seems to be receiving more pollutants than it was designed to handle. Pumps were removed from automatic mode to prevent washing out microbes and are now operated manually. A SCADA systemwhich would be neededfree to automatethose in the community who participated. The committee is actively working on promoting the trails as off-road and safer options for traveling between schools and neighborhoods and working through educational material to send out regarding the “rules of the roads/trails” such as road safety, looking both ways, walking against traffic, riding with traffic, etc. Village of Red Hook Climate Smart Communities Monthly Report April 2025 April’s meeting was devoted to collecting suggestions of pledge elements from the CSC Program to start to prioritize them safelyfor Board Approval. I raisedHowever, the possibilitytaskforce ofmust abe sewer-useformally areacreated moratoriumwith due to community concerns and the plant’s current instability, even though it’s under capacityauthority. No specific criteria for triggering a moratoriumThere were provided,many onlyAction items from each Pledge Element that it would be a last-resort measurehelpful. The mayorTour de Red Hook Bike ride was discussed in relation to PE 6 (climate smart land use). It offers a great opportunity to gather more data on street and Roberttrail Floresusage (Delawareand sewerrequests operator)directly hostedfrom our residents. The Repair Café was a secondwellattended communityevent infothat session,happens quarterly with athe thirdTown’s scheduledCAC forat **Thursday, June 5.** The SewerRed teamHook meetsCommunity everyCenter other Friday. If you have concerns, comments, etc. related to– the WWTPCSC orparticipated thevia Sewerengagement Usewith Area please do not hesitate to reach out.residents

References

This document cites or incorporates the following separate documents:

Referenced by

These other documents cite or incorporate this one:

Recurring pattern

These other chains use the same template but are separate decisions: