Microbiological Samples and Free Chlorine Residual
| Sample Location | Date of Sample | Sample Type | Total | E.coli | Free Chlorine Residual | Did not collect/analyze repeat sample. | Did not collect/analyze repeat sample. | | - | - | 1.Routine | Coliform | Positive | (mg/l) | - | - | | - | - | 2.Repeat | Positive | - | - | Population Served: | Population Served: | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Number of microbiological monitoring samples required: | Number of microbiological monitoring samples required: | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Number of microbiological monitoring samples taken: | Number of microbiological monitoring samples taken: | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Did an M&R violation oc | Did an M&R violation oc | | - | - | - | - | - | - | If “Yes,” check reason (s) below: | If “Yes,” check reason (s) below: | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Actual number of samples is fewer than required. | Actual number of samples is fewer than required. | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Did an MCL violation occur? | Did an MCL violation occur? | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Did not collect/analyze for E. coli for positive total coliform from | Did not collect/analyze for E. coli for positive total coliform from | | - | - | - | - | - | - | routine/repeat sample. | routine/repeat sample. | | - | - | - | - | - | - | If “Yes,” check reason(s) below (see also Part 5, Table 6 for | If “Yes,” check reason(s) below (see also Part 5, Table 6 for | | - | - | - | - | - | - | additional information). | additional information). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | For systems collecting less than 40 samples per month: two or m | For systems collecting less than 40 samples per month: two or m | | - | - | - | - | - | - | samples (routine and /or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= | samples (routine and /or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= | | - | - | - | - | - | - | MCL | MCL | | - | - | - | - | - | - | violation). | violation). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | The original sample was E.coli positive and at least 1 repeat sam | The original sample was E.coli positive and at least 1 repeat sam | | - | - | - | - | - | - | positive for total coliform ( =E.coli MCL violation | positive for total coliform ( =E.coli MCL violation | | - | - | - | - | - | - | ). | ). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | For systems collecting 40 or more samples per month: more than | For systems collecting 40 or more samples per month: more than | | - | - | - | - | - | - | samples (routine and/or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= t | samples (routine and/or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= t | | - | - | - | - | - | - | MCL | MCL | | - | - | - | - | - | - | violation). | violation). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes | Yes | | - | - | - | - | - | - | No | No | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Yes | Yes | | - | - | - | - | - | - | No | No | |||||||||3| |11 Cambridge|9/19/2025|1|Yes No|Yes No|1.55|||| |||||||||3| |7588 Broadway|9/19/2025|1|Yes No|Yes No|1.12|||ore of the total coliform ple was 5% of the otal coliform| |Traditions Post office|9/19/2025|1|Yes No|Yes No|1.07|||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||Reminder: System must collect a monitoring samples during the|minimum of five (5) routine microbiological month following a repeat sample collection.|| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| |||||||As required by 5-1.72, “Operation form shall be sent to your local hea the next reporting period.|of a Public Water System,” a copy of this lth department by the 10th calendar day of|| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No||||| ||||Yes No|Yes No|||||
Sample Collector(s): Les Coon Jr
Name of NYSDOH Certified Laboratory: AG Environmental labs Did any MCL violation occur? If so, please describe: NO
Did an emergency or low pressure problem occur? Did source water bypass an existing treatment process in the system? If so, please explain.
Service line leak in area of Golden Wok (abandoned service line)
Comments: Discovered distribution valve #2 open creating a bypass in flow metering. After closing flow increased from ~83 gpm to ~164 gpm