Water Quality Monitoring Report — October 2025

↑Meetings/Document history/chain_2271

1 versions2025-11-13attached document

Versions

12025-11-13
Water Quality Monitoring Report — October 2025
attached document

Document

Open original PDF View version history →

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Bureau of Water Supply Protection

Water Systems Operation Report

Microbiological Sample Results

	Public Water System Name	Public Water System Name		Reporting Month/Year	Reporting Month/Year		Date Report Submitted	Date Report Submitted	Source Water Type(s)	Source Water Type(s)
	Village of Red Hook				Oct-25		11/7/2025		Surface
Ground
GWUDI
Purchase with subsequent chlorination
Purchase w/out subsequent chlorination
	Public Water System ID				County		Town, Village, or City
	NY1302775				Dutchess		Village of Red Hook

DATE	Source(s) in Use	Treated water
volume (
gallons/day)			Chlorination		Other Treatments / Readings
			Gaseous		Liquid	Free chlorine
residual at entry
point (mg/l)
			Cylinder
weight (lbs.)	Chlorine
used per
day (lbs.)	Hypochlorite added to
crock (gallons or quarts)
1		223816				1.82
2		224733			15	1.86
3		224059				1.9
4		228856			10	1.9
5		260203				1.86
6		238162			10	1.76
7		227434				1.79
8		226883			10	1.93
9		228555				1.87
10		221691			5	1.94
11		225952			5	1.82
12		217005			10	1.88
13		225722				1.88
14		224429			20	1.87
15		217386				1.83
16		223110				1.85
17		216646				1.9
18		219616			10	1.93
19		227619				1.96
20		227070				1.9
21		220935			10	1.85
22		214079			10	1.71
23		218754				2.04
24		218437			15	2.13
25		219984				2.1
26		227748				2.12
27		218398			10	1.44
28		218740				1.43
29		209431				1.63
30		217300			10	1.89
31		219449				1.92
Total		6932202			150
AVG.		223619		#DIV/0!	4.84	1.86	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!

Chlorine Mix Ratio = quarts/gallons of Reported by: Leslie A Coon Jr Title: Sr. Area Manager Signature: Date:

% chlorine added to gallons of water in crock NYS DOH Operator Certification Number: NY0039091 Operator Grade Level IIB/C

11/7/2025

Microbiological Samples and Free Chlorine Residual

| Sample Location | Date of Sample | Sample Type | Total | E.coli | Free Chlorine Residual | Did not collect/analyze repeat sample. | Did not collect/analyze repeat sample. | | - | - | 1.Routine | Coliform | Positive | (mg/l) | For systems collecting 40 or more samples per month: more than | For systems collecting 40 or more samples per month: more than | | - | - | 2.Repeat | Positive | - | - | samples (routine and/or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= t | samples (routine and/or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= t | | - | - | - | - | - | - | MCL | MCL | | - | - | - | - | - | - | violation). | violation). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | The original sample was E.coli positive and at least 1 repeat sam | The original sample was E.coli positive and at least 1 repeat sam | | - | - | - | - | - | - | positive for total coliform ( =E.coli MCL violation | positive for total coliform ( =E.coli MCL violation | | - | - | - | - | - | - | ). | ). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Did an MCL violation occur? | Did an MCL violation occur? | | - | - | - | - | - | - | Did not collect/analyze for E. coli for positive total coliform from | Did not collect/analyze for E. coli for positive total coliform from | | - | - | - | - | - | - | routine/repeat sample. | routine/repeat sample. | | - | - | - | - | - | - | If “Yes,” check reason(s) below (see also Part 5, Table 6 for | If “Yes,” check reason(s) below (see also Part 5, Table 6 for | | - | - | - | - | - | - | additional information). | additional information). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | For systems collecting less than 40 samples per month: two or m | For systems collecting less than 40 samples per month: two or m | | - | - | - | - | - | - | samples (routine and /or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= | samples (routine and /or repeat) are positive for total coliform (= | | - | - | - | - | - | - | MCL | MCL | | - | - | - | - | - | - | violation). | violation). | | - | - | - | - | - | - | If “Yes,” check reason (s) below: | If “Yes,” check reason (s) below: |

-	-	-	-	-	-	Actual number of samples is fewer than required.	Actual number of samples is fewer than required.
-	-	-	-	-	-	Population Served:	Population Served:
-	-	-	-	-	-	Number of microbiological monitoring samples required:	Number of microbiological monitoring samples required:
-	-	-	-	-	-	Number of microbiological monitoring samples taken:	Number of microbiological monitoring samples taken:
-	-	-	-	-	-	Did an M&R violation oc	Did an M&R violation oc
-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes	Yes
-	-	-	-	-	-	No	No
-	-	-	-	-	-	Yes	Yes
-	-	-	-	-	-	No	No

7585 South Broadway	10/29/2025	1	Yes
No	Yes
No	1.23

7467 South Broadway	10/29/2025	1	Yes
No	Yes
No	1.35			5% of the
otal coliform
ple was
ore of the
total coliform
Traditions Mailroom	10/29/2025	1	Yes
No	Yes
No	1.1
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No		Reminder: System must collect a
monitoring samples during the	minimum of five (5) routine microbiological
month following a repeat sample collection.
			Yes
No	Yes
No
						As required by 5-1.72, “Operation
form shall be sent to your local hea
the next reporting period.	of a Public Water System,” a copy of this
lth department by the 10th calendar day of
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No
			Yes
No	Yes
No

Sample Collector(s): LJ

Name of NYSDOH Certified Laboratory: AG Environmental Did any MCL violation occur? If so, please describe:

Did an emergency or low pressure problem occur? Did source water bypass an existing treatment process in the system? If so, please explain.

Comments:

Changes between versions

2025-06-09→2025-06-09

substantive change+0 −22

The document was significantly truncated, removing all narrative reports on water usage, language access, and traffic safety projects.

Title changed from 'Water Department Report — May 2025' to 'Utility Billing Report — May 2025'
Removed entire 'Water Department' section regarding water usage and testing results
Removed entire 'Language Access Grant' section regarding equipment and MIG grant reimbursement
Removed entire 'School Speed Zone & Village-wide 25 mph Projects' section regarding DOT advisory changes and upcoming resolutions

Show red-line diff

Amy Smith Reports for Village Board Meeting: Monday, June 9, 2025 ## **Water Department** There was no meeting since the last Board meeting. However, I can report on water usage and testing results. In the month of May, the Village Water Department customers used almost 9 million gallons of water (8,918,020) for an average consumption of 287,678 gallons per day. Three locations were sampled on May 21, 2025. All three locations were negative for Coliform and E. coli. The free chlorine residual amounts ranged from .35 mg/liter to .01 mg/liter. As a reminder, there are 1000 mg in a liter of water. ## **Language Access Grant** In keeping with what I said at last month’s workshop meeting, equipment was purchased that will allow anyone attending a public meeting to get simultaneous interpretation via bluetooth headphones linked to Chromebooks that connect the users with a remote interpreter who is accessing the meeting via the Village’s Zoom account. The Village has 5 sets of headphones and 5 Chromebooks, each with a protective sleeve case. The full cost of this equipment is reimbursable by Dutchess County via the Village’s MIG grant to provide greater Language Access to Village information and services. ## **School Speed Zone & Village-wide 25 mph Projects** I have taken over these initiatives begun by Trustee Kym Bradley-Rickard. After reading the draft report from Creighton Manning, I’ve set up a meeting with Ken Wersted, the Village’s contact. I will be asking Mr Wersted about how recent advisory changes by DOT might affect the draft reports’ conclusions and suggest a final report. The next step to move the school speed zone forward is for the Village to pass a resolution in favor of establishing one which would be submitted to DOT along with a letter of support from the school district. The school district has expressed enthusiasm for the project and, provided I have the letter of support by the June workshop, I will present a resolution on the topic so that we can get this project moving again. ## Utility Billing Report Water/Sewer Department May 2025 |Utility Billing Report<br>Water/Sewer Department<br>May 2025|| |---|---| |Utility Bills Issued|$0.00| |Penalties/Finance Charges Issued|$1,117.85| |Utility Payments Received|$24,112.43| |Accounts Receivable Outstanding to the Village as of 6/1/2025|$12,542.77| Bill Adjustments[1] - None Submitted by, Jennifer Cavanaugh, Water/Sewer Clerk > 1 All adjustments must be approved by Water Department and Mayor and reviewed by Board of Trustees. One adjustment allowed per 5‐year period.

2025-06-09→2025-06-09

clerical+0 −0

The documents are identical in substance and content.

Show red-line diff

## Utility Billing Report Water/Sewer Department May 2025 |Utility Billing Report<br>Water/Sewer Department<br>May 2025|| |---|---| |Utility Bills Issued|$0.00| |Penalties/Finance Charges Issued|$1,117.85| |Utility Payments Received|$24,112.43| |Accounts Receivable Outstanding to the Village as of 6/1/2025|$12,542.77| Bill Adjustments[1] - None Submitted by, Jennifer Cavanaugh, Water/Sewer Clerk > 1 All adjustments must be approved by Water Department and Mayor and reviewed by Board of Trustees. One adjustment allowed per 5‐year period.

Referenced by

These other documents cite or incorporate this one:

Recurring pattern

These other chains use the same template but are separate decisions: