Red Hook WatchIndependent Community Resource

AG Environmental Lab Report #80725 — January 5, 2026

↑Meetings/Document history/chain_2454
1 versions2026-02-05attached document

Versions

  1. 12026-02-05
    AG Environmental Lab Report #80725 — January 5, 2026
    attached document

Document

Open original PDFView version history →

==> picture [36 x 37] intentionally omitted <==

AG ENVIRONMENTAL RSC, LLC

==> picture [484 x 56] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [26 x 26] intentionally omitted <==

NYSDOH ELAP # 12081 PA DEP # 68-05705 FLORIDA (Legionella) # E871152 Connecticut # PH-0808

|AG ENVIRONMENTAL RSC, LLC|AG ENVIRONMENTAL RSC, LLC|||||NYSDOH ELAP # 12081 PA DEP # 68-05705 FLORIDA (Legionella) # E871152 Connecticut # PH-0808| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |86Queen Mountain Road, Ferndale, New York, 12734 / Phone: 845.704.8151 / Fax: 845.414.0051|||||Original Report #: 80725 LCR Issue Date: 01/05/2026|| |Bill-to Customer Information(C55068)|||Water Source Location X55068-02|||| |Customer Name:|Village of Red Hook||Source Name:|Village of Red Hook WW||| |Address:|7467 South Broadway||Address:|7467 South Broadway||| |Town:|RED HOOKState:NYZip:12571||Town:|RED HOOKState:NYZip:12571||| |Phone:|000-000-0000||PWSID/SPDES:|||| |Email:|treasurer@redhookvillage.gov||Contact Name:|Les Coon||| |Fax:|||Phone:|8455443151||| |Sample(s) delivered on12/19/2025at01:10 PM|||||**From COC#:**77236||

|**Sample# **|MTX|Sample Point|Sampled **Date & Time **|**Temp **|Pres. Y/N/T|Res **Cl **|Int|Analyze Prep Date Time|Test Method|Comment (see table)|Analyte|Results|MCL (Limits)|SMCL (Limits)| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |SB00059127|WW|EFFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|Y||ZJS|12/22/2025 10:14 AM DE|Ammonia (as N) by EPA 350.1 Method|N A-00561|Ammonia (as N)|0.468 mg/L||| |SB00059126|WW-G|EFFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|T||ZJS|12/19/2025 03:49 PM MV|Fecal Coliform Count by Colilert-18 Method|N 1766188195340|Fecal Coliform|2.0 MPN/100mL||| |SB00059125|WW|EFFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|Y||ZJS|12/22/2025 08:42 AM KD|Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen by Hach 10242 Method|N TKN-00456|Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen|1.96 mg/L||| |SB00059124|WW|EFFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|N||ZJS|12/23/2025 11:47 AM CJ|Total Suspended Solids by SM22 2540D Method|N TS-01020|Total Suspended Solids|10.2 mg/L||| |SB00059123|WW|EFFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|N||ZJS|12/19/2025 12:59 PM CW|Carbonaceous BOD, 5-Day by SM22 5210B|N CBOD-00798B|Carbonaceous BOD, 5 day|3.7 mg/L||| |SB00059122|WW|INFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|N||ZJS|12/23/2025 11:47 AM CJ|Total Suspended Solids by SM22 2540D Method|N TS-01020|Total Suspended Solids|190.0 mg/L||| |SB00059121|WW|INFLUENT 1B|12/19/2025 10:35 AM|0.9°C G8|N||ZJS|12/19/2025 12:59 PM CW|Carbonaceous BOD, 5-Day by SM22 5210B|N CBOD-00798B|Carbonaceous BOD, 5 day|292 mg/L|||

Comment Table: N - No Comment |

Remarks: T = Sodium Thiosulfate |

This report cannot be reproduced without written permission of Sullivan County Labs. Test results are limited to those methods under which our lab is certified by ELAP. Results only relate to actual samples received. The following information is provided by the customer and not by the laboratory: Source information, matrix, sample point, sampled date/time, residual chlorine, initials, and test requested. Original Report #: 80725 Page 1 of (2)

Authorized By:

==> picture [91 x 46] intentionally omitted <==

Kylea May | Document Control

Original Report #: 80725 Page 2 of (2)

Changes between versions

2026-03-23→2026-03-23
adopted+33 −2

The document transitioned from a single RESOLVED clause to a detailed, multi-section formal policy.

  • Status changed from a 'RESOLVED' clause to a full 'Adopted' policy document
  • Scope expanded from 'employees' to include 'Village Employees and Elected Officials'
  • Added 'Verification of AI-Generated Content' section detailing requirements for accuracy and bias checks
  • Added 'Handling Sensitive or Confidential Information' section including a specific definition of PII and examples of prohibited data
  • Added 'Responsible Use' section including a requirement to 'Cite any AI use at the beginning of a document identifying the AI tool used'
  • Added escalation procedure: 'When in doubt... consult the Mayor or the Village Board'
Show red-line diff
RESOLVED**==> clauses: -picture The[70 Policyx for69] theintentionally Useomitted of<==** ## ArtificialPOLICY IntelligenceFOR THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) ToolsTOOLS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Village Employees and ConfidentialElected InformationOfficials is hereby adopted, establishing that employees“Employees” may occasionally use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to assist with tasks such as drafting content, summarizing information, or generating ideas. While AI can be a helpful resource, butit mustis verifyimportant allto use these tools responsibly and with caution. Although AI may be utilized in the assistance of certain tasks, the individual employee remains responsible for the final work product, including any errors. Verification of AI-Generated Content: - AI-generated content may be inaccurate, incomplete, or biased. Employees must always verify information from AI tools before using it in reports, communications, or any official documents. - Critical decisions, legal documents, financial information, or other business-sensitive materials should never rely solely on AI output. Handling Sensitive or Confidential Information: - Employees must not input confidential, proprietary, or personally identifiable information (PII) into AI tools. - PII is information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual’s identity, musteither citealone anyor AIwhen usecombined inwith documentsother information that is linked or linkable to a specific individual (definition from US Dept of Labor). - Examples of prohibited information include but are not limited to: employee personal data, customer or vendor details, financial records, and mustintellectual useproperty. - Sharing sensitive information with AI systems could violate privacy regulations and company policy and may pose a security risk. Responsible Use: - AI tools should be used as supportive aids, rather thannot replacements for professional judgment, human review, or standard verification procedures. - Cite any AI use at the beginning of a document identifying the AI tool used. - When in doubt about whether information can be shared with AI or how to verify AI output, consult the Mayor or the Village Board. By adhering to these guidelines, employees help maintain the accuracy, security, and integrity of company information while leveraging AI responsibly. Adopted by the Board of Trustees on March 23, 2026
2026-03-23→2026-03-23
clerical+0 −0

No substantive changes were made to the document.

Show red-line diff
**==> picture [70 x 69] intentionally omitted <==** ## POLICY FOR THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TOOLS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Village Employees and Elected Officials “Employees” may occasionally use artificial intelligence (AI) tools to assist with tasks such as drafting content, summarizing information, or generating ideas. While AI can be a helpful resource, it is important to use these tools responsibly and with caution. Although AI may be utilized in the assistance of certain tasks, the individual employee remains responsible for the final work product, including any errors. Verification of AI-Generated Content: - AI-generated content may be inaccurate, incomplete, or biased. Employees must always verify information from AI tools before using it in reports, communications, or any official documents. - Critical decisions, legal documents, financial information, or other business-sensitive materials should never rely solely on AI output. Handling Sensitive or Confidential Information: - Employees must not input confidential, proprietary, or personally identifiable information (PII) into AI tools. - PII is information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual’s identity, either alone or when combined with other information that is linked or linkable to a specific individual (definition from US Dept of Labor). - Examples of prohibited information include but are not limited to: employee personal data, customer or vendor details, financial records, and intellectual property. - Sharing sensitive information with AI systems could violate privacy regulations and company policy and may pose a security risk. Responsible Use: - AI tools should be used as supportive aids, not replacements for professional judgment, human review, or standard verification procedures. - Cite any AI use at the beginning of a document identifying the AI tool used. - When in doubt about whether information can be shared with AI or how to verify AI output, consult the Mayor or the Village Board. By adhering to these guidelines, employees help maintain the accuracy, security, and integrity of company information while leveraging AI responsibly. Adopted by the Board of Trustees on March 23, 2026

Referenced by

These other documents cite or incorporate this one:

Recurring pattern

These other chains use the same template but are separate decisions: