Red Hook WatchIndependent Community Resource

20250725 DEC Consent Order Ver 2

1 versions2025-07-25working document

Versions

  1. 12025-07-25

Document

KATHY HOCHUL Governor AMANDA LEFTON Commissioner

==> picture [157 x 42] intentionally omitted <==

July 25, 2025

Via E-mail (mayor@redhooknyvillage.gov) and U.S. Mail

Village of Red Hook Attn: Mayor Smythe 7467 S. Broadway Red Hook, NY 12571

RE: Village of Red Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) SPDES NY0271420 DEC Application No. 3-1348-00146/00007 Village of Red Hook, Dutchess County

Status of SPDES Administrative Renewal, Public Comments Received And Request for Temporary Suspension of Uniform Procedures Act (UPA) Time Frames

Dear Mayor Smythe:

On April 21, 2025, a UPA time frame suspension request was sent to you by letter to afford both the Village of Red Hook and NYSDEC staff time to properly evaluate comments received on the Department’s intent to administratively renew the subject permit, as published in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (ENB) on March 5, 2025. NYSDEC received your countersignature and concurrence on April 23, 2025, to extend UPA time frames until July 21, 2025.

At this time, the Department would like to request another UPA time frame extension for an additional 90 days, to provide time for appropriate responses and compliance procedures to be finalized. At the end of this time period, October 23, 2025, NYSDEC’s review and application processing time frames will resume again. To satisfy this request, please return to me a version of this letter with the bottom half, the Uniform Procedures Time Frame Extension, with your signature, by August 1, 2025.

Until the review is complete and a final determination regarding permit renewal is made, the current renewal application remains pending, and the existing permit will remain in effect pursuant to Section 401(2) of the State Administrative Procedure Act.

If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at (518) 4029167.

Sincerely,

Teress Baldwin Environmental Program Specialist I

Division of Environmental Permits 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-1750 | dec.ny.gov | DEPPermitting@dec.ny.gov | (518) 402-9167

Ecc:

J. Petronella, Assistant Regional Director, DEC Region 3 T. O’Malley, Regional Permit Administrator, DEC Region 3 M. George, Regional Water Engineer, DEC Region 3 L. Gregory, Bureau of Water Permits, DEC Central Office

Uniform Procedures Time Frame Extension

By signing below, the Village of Red Hook, hereby consents to the extension of the final decision due date established in NYS Uniform Procedures Act (UPA) regulations (6 NYCRR Part 621) to 11:59 p.m. October 23, 2025 and a commensurate extension of all subsequent UPA time frames associated with, but not limited to, hearing decisions, related to its current application to renew DEC Permit No. 3-1348-00146/00007 (SPDES Permit).

___________________________________ Signature

___________________________________ Date

___________________________________ Name (print)/Title For

Village of Red Hook

STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

---------------------------------------------------------------------------X

In the Matter of the Violations of Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules, and Regulations of the State of New York,

ORDER ON CONSENT

-by- DEC Case No. Village of Red Hook, R3-20250610-54

Respondent.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------X

WHEREAS :

  1. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department or DEC) is responsible for the conservation, improvement, and protection of the natural resources and environment of New York State to enhance the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well-being;

  2. The Department is responsible for the administration and enforcement of laws, regulations, and management of water pollution control and the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permits issued thereunder pursuant to Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and Title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York (NYCRR) Parts 700 et seq . and 750 et seq .;

  3. Respondent VILLAGE OF RED HOOK maintains its principal office at Village Hall, 7647 South Broadway, Red Hook, New York 12571;

  4. Respondent owns the facility identified as the Village of Red Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) located on U.S. Route 9, Red Hook, New York 12571 (the Facility); and

  5. The Department issued a SPDES permit (NY0271420) (the SPDES Permit) on May 1, 2020 for the Facility authorizing the discharge of treated sanitary wastewater into a subtributary of the Saw Kill, a Class C(T) waterbody.

FACTS

  1. On March 21, 2025, Department staff inspected the Facility.

  2. The Discharge Monitoring Reports (“DMRs”) reviewed by Department staff during the March 21, 2025 inspection document that between January 31, 2024 and February 28, 2025, the Facility exceeded effluent limits in the SPDES permit:

    • a. Six times for flow;

    • b. Four times for ultimate oxygen demand;

    • c. Three times for ammonia (as nitrogen);

    • d. Three times for total suspended solids;

    • e. Two times for dissolved oxygen;

    • f. Two times for settleable solids; and

    • g. Two times for fecal coliform.

  3. During the March 21, 2025 inspection, Department staff also observed the

following:

  • a. Flow meters at the Facility were not calibrated;

  • b. The ultraviolet disinfection system was not working; and

  • c. The Facility did not have a qualified assistant operator as defined in 6 NYCRR 650.2(b).

  1. The Facility was also using chlorine (a Water Treatment Chemical or WTC)

without DEC approval. SPDES Permit condition I provides in pertinent part that new or

2

increased use and discharge of a WTC requires prior Department review and authorization. At a minimum, the permittee must notify the Department in writing of its intent to change WTC use by submitting a completed WTC Notification Form for each proposed WTC.

  1. Department staff issued a Notice of Violation to the Respondent on April 14, 2025 for the above effluent limits and other violations.

  2. In the April 14, 2025, the Department directed the Respondent to immediately implement corrective actions for the above violations.

APPLICABLE LAW

  1. 6 NYCRR 650.4(a) provides that a wastewater treatment plant must at all times be under the responsible supervision of a chief operator or assistant/shift operator certified pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 650.

  2. 6 NYCRR 750-2.1(e) provides in pertinent part that the SPDES permittee must comply with all terms and conditions of the permit.

  3. 6 NYCRR 750-2.5(a)(5) provides in pertinent part that for instrumentation that is not used by a certified laboratory, but which is used to measure discharges to the environment as specified in a SPDES permit, the permittee shall periodically calibrate and perform maintenance procedures to ensure accuracy of measurements. Verification of maintenance shall be logged into the record book(s) of the facility.

  4. 6 NYCRR 750-2.8(a)(5) provides in pertinent part that the SPDES permittee and operator shall operate the wastewater treatment facility in such a manner as to minimize the discharge of pollutants to a degree that is achievable when compared to standard practices for operation of such wastewater treatment facilities.

3

  1. ECL § 71-1929 provides that a person who fails to perform any duty imposed by Titles 1 through 11 inclusive and title 19 of Article 17, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or orders or determinations of the commissioner promulgated thereto, shall be liable for a penalty not to exceed thirty-seven thousand, five hundred dollars ($37,500) per day for each violation, and may be enjoined from any continuing violation.

VIOLATIONS

  1. By operating the Facility without a qualified assistant operator, Respondent violated 6 NYCRR 650.4(a).

  2. By exceeding effluent limitations in the SPDES permit a total of twenty-two (22) times between January 31, 2024 and February 28, 2025, the Respondent violated 6 NYCRR 750-2.1(e).

  3. By utilizing chlorine as a Water Treatment Chemical at the Facility without DEC notification or approval, the Respondent violated Permit condition I and 6 NYCRR 750-2.1(e).

  4. By failing to calibrate flow meters at the Facility, Respondent violated 6 NYCRR 750-2.5(a)(5).

  5. By failing to maintain the ultraviolet disinfection system at the Facility, the Respondent violated 6 NYCRR 750-2.8(a)(5).

CONSENT

  1. The Respondent admits the violations set forth above, waives the right to a public hearing in this matter, consents to the issuing and entering of this Order, and

4

agrees to be bound by the terms, provisions and conditions of this Order including the attached Schedule of Compliance.

NOW, having considered this matter and being duly advised, it is ORDERED that:

I. Civil Penalty

A. The Respondent is hereby assessed a civil penalty in the amount of TWENTY-FOUR THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($24,800). Of that amount, FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000) is payable to the Department on the Respondent’s execution of this Order. The remaining penalty amount of NINETEEN THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($19,800) is suspended provided the Respondent complies strictly with the terms of this Order. If the Respondent violates any term of this Order, the entire suspended penalty shall be due within 10 days of receiving a notice of noncompliance from the Department.

B. Payment shall be either by electronic transfer at the following web address: http://www.dec.ny.gov/about/61016.html or by check or money order payable to the “New York State Department of Environmental Conservation” with the DEC case number of this Order written in the memo section of the check, and sent to NYSDEC, Division of Management and Budget, 625 Broadway, 10[th] Floor, Albany, NY 12233-4900 along with the enclosed invoice.

C. The executed original of this Order shall be forwarded to the Regional Attorney, NYSDEC Region 3, 21 South Putt Corners Road, New Paltz, NY 12561.

5

II. Full Settlement

This Order shall be in full settlement of all claims for civil and administrative penalties that have been or could be asserted by the Department against Respondent, their trustees, officers, employees, successors and assigns for the violations expressly noted in this Order. This Order shall not be construed as being in settlement of events regarding which the Department lacks knowledge, or which occur after the effective date of this Order.

III. Schedule of Compliance

The Respondent shall strictly comply with the terms of this Order and any Schedule of Compliance attached to this Order. The Schedule of Compliance and any submissions made pursuant thereto are hereby deemed incorporated into this Order, upon approval by the Department if such approval is required, and shall be fully enforceable as part of this Order.

IV. Review of Submitted Remedial Plans and Proposals

If the Department approves any submission required under this Order, the Respondent shall implement it in accordance with its schedule and terms. If the Department disapproves the submission, the Department shall specify the grounds for disapproval. Within 15 days after receiving notice of disapproval, the Respondent shall submit a revision that fully responds to each of the Department's grounds for disapproval. If the Department approves the revised submission, the Respondent shall implement it in accordance with its schedule and terms as approved. If the revised submission is not approvable, the Department may approve it on condition that the Respondent accept such modifications as may be specified by the Department. If the Respondent does not accept

6

such modifications, and the Department disapproves the revised submission, the Respondent shall be in violation of this Order. The Respondent shall be in violation of this Order if any submission is of such poor quality that it does not constitute a good faith effort to comply with the provisions of this Order.

V. Inspections

Department representatives shall be permitted access to the subject site and facility and to relevant records during regular hours to inspect and/or perform such tests and other activities to ensure compliance with this Order and applicable law.

VI. Other Approvals

This Order is not a permit, or a modification of a permit, under any federal, state or local laws or regulations. Unless otherwise allowed by law or regulation, the Respondent must comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and permits. The Respondent shall obtain whatever permits, easements, rights of entry, approvals or authorizations necessary to comply with this Order.

VII. Other Remedies; Natural Resource Damages

A. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as barring, diminishing, adjudicating or in any way affecting (1) any rights or claims, actions, suits, causes of action or demands that the Department may have against anyone other than the Respondent; (2) the Department's right to enforce the terms of this Order against the Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors and assigns in the event that the Respondent shall be in breach of its provisions; (3) the Department's right to bring any action against the Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors and assigns that the Department could otherwise maintain

7

with respect to areas or resources that may have been affected or contaminated as a result of the release or migration of wastes from the site or its vicinity, or to require that the Respondent take such additional measures as may be necessary for the protection of public health or the environment, including interim remedial measures; (4) the Department's right to commence any action or proceeding relating to any disposal of hazardous wastes at or from the site, as those wastes are defined by applicable regulation; or (5) the Respondent’s right to challenge any such action by the Department, whether by administrative hearing or otherwise, to the extent otherwise permitted by law.

B. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as barring, diminishing, adjudicating or in any way affecting the Department’s rights or authorities, including the right to recover natural resource damages against any party including the Respondent and the right to seek reimbursement of any expenditures from the New York State Environmental Protection and Spill Compensation Fund.

C. This Order shall not be construed to prohibit the Commissioner or the Commissioner’s authorized representative from exercising any summary abatement powers, either at common law or as granted pursuant to statute or regulation.

VIII. Indemnification

The Respondent or any successors, assigns or transferees, shall indemnify and hold harmless the Department, the State of New York, and their representatives and employees, for all claims, suits, actions, damages and costs of every description arising out of or resulting from the fulfillment or attempted fulfillment of this Order by the Respondent, its directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, successors or assigns.

8

IX. Force Majeure

If the Respondent cannot comply with this Order because of a natural disaster, war, terrorist attack, strike, riot, judicial injunction, federal- or state-ordered state of emergency related to an epidemic or pandemic, or other, similar unforeseeable event which was not caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Respondent and which could not have been avoided through the exercise of due care, the Respondent shall apply in writing within 21 days of obtaining knowledge of such fact to request a modification of the deadline or requirement. Such application shall include the measures taken to prevent and/or minimize any delays. Failure to give such notice constitutes a waiver of any claim that a delay is not subject to penalties. The Respondent shall have the burden of proving that an event is a defense to a claim of non-compliance with this Order pursuant to this subparagraph.

X. Default of Payment

The penalty assessed in the Order is a debt owed to the State of New York. Failure to pay the penalty, or any part thereof, in accordance with the requirements of this Order, may result in referral to the New York State Attorney General for collection of the entire amount owed (including the assessment of interest, and a charge to cover the cost of collecting the debt), and/or referral to the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, which may offset any tax refund or other monies that may be owed to the Respondent by the State of New York. Any suspended and/or stipulated

penalty provided for in this Order will constitute a debt owed to the State of New York when and if such penalty becomes due.

9

XI. Failure, Default, and Violation of Order

The failure of Respondent to comply with any provision of this Order shall constitute a default and a failure to perform an obligation under this Order and shall be deemed to be a violation of both this Order and the ECL. Respondent's failure to comply fully and in timely fashion with any provision, term, or condition of this Order shall constitute a default and a failure to perform an obligation under this Order and under the ECL and shall constitute sufficient grounds for revocation of any permit, license, certification, or approval issued to the Respondent by the Department.

XII. Entire Agreement

The provisions of this Order constitute the complete and entire Order issued to the Respondent, concerning resolution of the violations identified in this Order. Terms, conditions, understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary any term hereof shall not be binding unless made in writing and subscribed by the party to be bound, pursuant to the Modification Paragraph of this Order. No informal oral or written advice, guidance, suggestion or comment by the Department regarding any report, proposal, plan, specification, schedule, comment or statement made or submitted by the Respondent shall be construed as relieving the Respondent of his/her obligations to obtain such formal approvals as may be required by this Order.

XIII. Binding Effect

This Order shall bind the Respondent, its officers, directors, agents, employees, contractors, successors and assigns, and all persons, firms and corporations acting under or for the Respondent including any subsequent operator of the facility, and any successor in title to the facility or any interest therein.

10

XIV. Effective Date and Termination

This Order shall become effective when signed by the Regional Director on behalf of the Commissioner, and shall terminate when its requirements are completed to

the Department’s satisfaction.

Dated: New Paltz, New York _______________, 20

AMANDA LEFTON Commissioner, NYSDEC

By: _____________________________ KELLY R. TURTURRO Regional Director DEC Region 3

11

CONSENT BY RESPONDENT

Respondent VILLAGE OF RED HOOK hereby consents to the issuance and entry of this Order without further notice, waives its right to a hearing in this matter, and agrees to be bound by the terms, conditions and provisions of this Order. The undersigned represents and affirms that they have the legal authority to bind the

VILLAGE OF RED HOOK

By: _________________________________ Print Name: ___________________________ Title: _________________________________ Date: ________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

On this ______ day of __________________, in the year 20, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared ________________________________________, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their capacity as shown in the instrument, and that by their signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument.

_____________________________ Notary Public

12

SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE DEC Case No.: R3-20250610-54

Respondent: Village of Red Hook Site: Village of Red Hook Wastewater Treatment Plant U.S. Route 9, Red Hook, New York 12571 SPDES Permit ID: NY0271420

Please reference DEC Case No. R3-20250610-54 on all submittals required under this Order, which shall be submitted to: Vijay Gandhi, Division of Water, NYSDEC Region 3, 21 South Putt Corners Road, New Paltz, NY 12561 (Vijay.Gandhi@dec.ny.gov)

Within 60 days of the effective date of this Order

The Respondent shall submit to the Department for review and approval an Engineering Report, in conformance with the latest version of the Engineering Report Outline for New York State Wastewater Infrastructure Projects and prepared by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of New York, and implementation schedule for upgrades and repairs needed at the Facility or in the collection system to eliminate violations of the SPDES permit.

13

Changes between versions

2026-02-092026-02-09
clerical+00

No substantive changes were made to the document.

Show red-line diff
Deputy Mayor Melkorka Kjarval’s Monthly Reports **February, 9th, 2026** ## **Red Hook Together** On January 21st a subgroup interested in exploring housing assistance models met at Town Hall for a presentation by Christa Hines of Hudson River Housing. In attendance were myself, Mayor Smythe, Town Supervisor Mckeon, Community Center Director Sara Ugolini and CC Program Director Jeung Ill, as well as Nevill Smythe, Red Hook Together Treasurer. I believe Cicely Wilson, from Bard CCE attended virtually. Hines summarized the federal and state aid programs that provide funding for Hudson River Housing’s programs, as well as explaining some of the eligibility requirements. The group meeting is organized by Bard Center for Civic Engagement & meets every first Thursday of the month. On Thurs, Feb 5th the group of Red Hook Together met over zoom. Bianca Verrelli, former Red Hook Responds director is now program director at Culture Connect. Historic Red Hook has two upcoming fundraisers, Chilli Night and Tavern Night. Rotary is planning Apple Blossom Day for May 9th - all non profit organizations are invited to table for free at the event. Panda TV is working with Ben Cooley’s Public Access Class at Bard, and the class is looking for any events and/or content that students could do for their classwork. Tivoli Library is working with Nextrex to collect 1,000 lbs of plastic film for recycling in exchange for a community bench. The Town of Red Hook will have E-waste recycling day the morning of Appleblossom day, from 7am -1pm at the Town Recycling Center. The Red Hook Public Library is looking for partners to host one of their 12 story walks, and an organization to host the Tour De Red Hook, a group ride through the Village of Red Hook. The Town of Red Hook Comprehensive Plan Committee is helping organize displays in the ‘art boxes’ around town to promote engagement in the plan process. Bard Center for Civic Engagement is looking to place students for their March Match opportunity, which is an Alternative Spring Break program. Students and local organizations are surveyed separately to match them for volunteer and mini-internship opportunities over spring break. Bard’s spring recess falls between March 14 – Mar 22 this year. ## **Town of Red Hook Comprehensive Plan:** The Town committee meets monthly from 7:30pm to 9pm on the fourth Tuesday at Town Hall. The latest meeting was January 27th. The meeting focused on final kitchen table conversations, formats for comprehensive plans and the outreach being conducted by the Community Engagement Subcommittee, who are working very hard to find ways to connect and invite different communities and neighborhoods to engage with the process. Anyone looking to be more involved in the plan which seeks to envision Red Hook’s shared future should consider joining or volunteering for the subcommittee; they are doing some great outreach. The next phase of the planning process will be to focus on goals and strategies around specific topics. For those who were not able to attend the first workshop, there will be a second workshop that will focus on goals and strategies that emerged from the earlier visioning process. |The next phase of the planning process will be to focus on goals and strategies around specifc<br>topics. For those who were not able to attend the frst workshop, there will be a second<br>workshop that will focus on goals and strategies that emerged from the earlier visioning<br>process.|The next phase of the planning process will be to focus on goals and strategies around specifc<br>topics. For those who were not able to attend the frst workshop, there will be a second<br>workshop that will focus on goals and strategies that emerged from the earlier visioning<br>process.| |---|---| ||| |**Links to Learn more about the Town Comprehensive Plan:**|| |CompPlan Site:|redhookny.gov/578/Town-of-Red-Hook-Comprehensive-Plan| |Keyfacts about RH:|redhookny.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4982/| |What is a CompPlan?:|redhookny.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4933/| |Online survey:|surveymonkey.com/r/RedHookVision| |VisioningWorkshopSummary|redhookny.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5069/| Town of Red Hook Community Preservation Fund: |Town of Red Hook Community Preservation Fund:|Town of Red Hook Community Preservation Fund:|| |---|---|---| |**From the Monthly Statement of the Red Hook Town Supervisor**||**Balance**| |||| |M&T Consolidated Account|Cm C’munityPres 0102|221,034.80| |NYclass Master Account|Cm CommunityPres. 0203|1,495,958.48| ||Green CPF 0204.100 Investment|1,840,020.98| ||Greene (Cpf Funds) 0204|111,094.65| |Previous balance(12/12/25)||3,907,346.21| |Town of Red Hook CPF Total Balance as of 12/31/2025||**3,668,108.91**| Source:Town Board Packet: https://www.redhookny.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/1098?fleID=20234 Mayor Smythe, myself, Tivoli Mayor Emily Majer & Tivoli Trustee Sarah Imboden met twice during the month of January, once on January 5th and once on January 21st. The goal of the meetings was to better understand if the Village of Tivoli and the Village of Red Hook currently have any role in advocating for Village resident interests during the identification and prioritization of projects within the villages in the CPF plan. We also were interested in exploring whether respective municipalities can contribute to the process that develops eligible projects (within the villages boundaries). For context, property owners who purchase village properties that exceed the threshold of the Dutchess County median home sale price are required to contribute an additional tax at the time of purchase to the Town Community Preservation Fund. For a reminder the fund can be used to acquisition development rights or property for the purpose of: - Parks, nature preserves, wildlife refuges, greenbelts, and recreation areas - Lands of exceptional scenic value - Protection of wetlands and aquifer recharge areas - Rare or endangered habitats and unique ecosystems - Public access to land for recreational use - Rivers, streams, shorelines, and waterway protection - Historic places and properties - Viable agricultural lands ## **Village of Red Hook Communications:** This month the Mayor and I made progress on a few ongoing projects: - At the request of the Village Clerk, I re-designed an emergency contact sticker that is affixed to exterior sewer pump utility panels; they will be ordered soon in a weatherproof material. - After back and forth with the Town CAC who generously offered to create a Helpsy explainer panel design for the Village, we decided to create a sign in a scale that could be read from a moving vehicle. The new panel announces both the Helpsy Textile Recycling & the newly launched Food Waste Collection Program. - After measuring the food collection shed, using copy developed by Trustee Uku, Mayor Smythe and I arranged the copy on the shed signage. I designed the layout, and then Mayor Smythe printed drafts for Trustee Uku to view after the January board meeting. Karen ordered the files, picked up the printed signage and installed it on the shed ahead of the Launch event on January 31st. Community members were invited to the Village Hall courtroom to pick up their compost bucket, as well as printed information guides outlining what could be composted and how to open the shed located in the Village Municipal Lot. Lucky attendees also enjoyed a delicious spread of Mighty Donuts kindly supplied by the Smythe family. - In order to decide the most efficient way to improve upon existing communication efforts, Karen and I have created a survey. Included are questions on which are the most effective existing communication methods, as well as which improvements constituents would like us to prioritize. We are hopeful that any data we receive will allow us to direct village resources most effectively. Please look out for flyers and promotions of the survey soon. - After consulting with the Village Clerk and Mayor, I created a designated page on the website within the building/planning dept called “Proposed Zoning Legislation & Meeting Recordings” to contain links to the draft study and draft zoning law. The draft documents & recordings were previously listed on the building and planning dept landing page. I updated the homepage newsflash to link to the new page and created a link in the previous document location to redirect users to the new page. - I attended the January 28th Chamber of Commerce meeting at Yum Yum Noodle to follow up my conversation with Chamber Director Colin Stark about the best way to connect with the Village Business community about their thoughts on the proposed zoning law. Colin was kind enough to include the upcoming law in his latest chamber newsletter in a section called “ **A collaborative conversation with the Village of Red Hook…** ”. I was pleased that he was able to convey how the Village board is eager to hear input on the draft law. - The Mayor contacted me to discuss how we could better organize the now extensive information housed on the Waste Water Treatment Plant Operations Page. We have finished a draft layout and are undergoing the final review process before implementation. ## **Village and Zoning Review:** There have been two Information Sessions on this Draft Study where our Planning Consultant, Bonnie Franson of Nelson Pope & Voorhis shared the background and process for development of the Draft Study and guided the discussion on Mar 13,2025, and Oct 13, 2025. Our land use attorney, Victoria Polidoro of Rodenhausen Chale & Polidoro was also in attendance at the Mar 13 session. There have been two Public Hearings: Dec 8, 2025 and Jan 12, 2026 where Consultant Franson attended via zoom to hear the public comments and answer board member questions. Included in the online version of this report are links to those session recordings. On Tues, Jan 20th, 2026, at noon, the Mayor and I met with Consultant Franson to review the comments from the public hearing, any further comments from the board including a written document from Trustee Uku, as well as requests and typo corrections identified from fellow trustees. Franson screen-shared the Land Use Study Document and went page by page, identifying areas where suggestions and requests could be implemented, and/or typos could be corrected. On Mon, Jan 26th, the board had its regularly scheduled monthly workshop, where I shared that we had made efforts to expand the historical context in the study, and that Nancy Bendiner’s project “Let's Meet The Elmendorph's Nineteenth-Century Neighbors” had been instructive as we sourced historical information about the Cherry/Graves neighborhood. The board scheduled a special meeting on Feb 5th to review and discuss the (then not yet completed by Franson) revision of the draft study. On Wed, January 28th Franson emailed Mayor Smythe and me the draft with changes redlined in yellow requesting a final review before broader distribution. I sent the Mayor the list of corrections I identified, she then refined the list, adding her own corrections, which were forwarded to Franson on Feb 1st. Franson corrected the errors and re-sent the document to the Mayor and me on the afternoon of Feb 4th. In the end, 21 pages of the 43 page study contain highlighted edits that were implemented following public feedback from the two public hearings and board feedback from the public hearings, subsequent board meetings, and any written feedback received. The evening of Feb 4th there was an email exchange between Trustee Uku and Consultant Franson over requests that Trustee Uku had sent directly to the consultant on January 16th which had been discussed at length at the January 12th board meeting with Franson following public comment. The Mayor responded to Trustee Uku providing written responses to her Feb 4th email, summarizing the takeaway from the board discussion and further clarification from Franson. (I was not included in that thread to comply with OML - although I was informed afterwards). At the February 5th Workshop meeting, board discussion produced a few additional requests which were sent to consultant Franson via email in order for a final study document to be prepared for the February 9th Public Hearing. **Planning/Zoning & Building Department:** See attached Reports

References

This document cites or incorporates the following separate documents:

Referenced by

These other documents cite or incorporate this one: