Resolution to Deny a Variance for an 80 Seat Restaurant
Activeformal_resolutionongoingDeny an area variance to exceed the 30-seat limit for a restaurant at 160 Pitcher Lane, finding that the additional 50 seats would result in disproportionate detriment to nearby neighbors.
First seen
2015-05-13
Latest event
2015-05-13
adopted
Expires
—
Resolution text
RESOLVED
- the variance to allow an 80-seat restaurant is denied
- the variance to allow the additional 50 seats would result in a disproportionate detriment to nearby neighbors compared to the benefit to the Applicant
- the requested variance would change the character and use of the site from a 30-seat restaurant to a more intensive commercial use
- the additional seating would enable excess noise and car traffic during night time hours
- the benefit sought by the Applicant can be achieved by other means, including operating a 30-seat restaurant as already permitted
- the requested variance is substantial, representing a 167% increase in seating
- the alleged difficulty is not self-created
Lifecycle (1 event)
2015-05-13adoptedvote: 6-1
Deny a variance for an 80-seat restaurant at 160 Pitcher Lane, limiting it to 30 seats as permitted.
moved by Munn · seconded by Annas
Show text snapshot for this event
Resolved
- the variance to allow an 80-seat restaurant is denied
- the variance to allow the additional 50 seats would result in a disproportionate detriment to nearby neighbors compared to the benefit to the Applicant
- the requested variance would change the character and use of the site from a 30-seat restaurant to a more intensive commercial use
- the additional seating would enable excess noise and car traffic during night time hours
- the benefit sought by the Applicant can be achieved by other means, including operating a 30-seat restaurant as already permitted
- the requested variance is substantial, representing a 167% increase in seating
- the alleged difficulty is not self-created
Subject key:
pitcher_lane_restaurant_seating_variance